Illusions of Imagination as an Analogy for the Influence of Passive Affects on Actions and Reasoning

Authors

  • Ivana Renić Department of Philosophy, University of Zadar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15291/ai.4848

Keywords:

affects, imagination, ideas, B. Spinoza, knowledge, judgment

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyse Spinoza’s original philosophical reflection on the ideas of the imagination and on the process of their formation in analogy with the ideas of affective states of the body, that is, in analogy with affects. The article examines the philosophical ideas of Baruch Spinoza with a focus on the special capacity of imagination and illusions that can arise from this cognitive capacity, thereby pointing in an analogous way to the correlation of passive affects, judgments and actions. The results of the analysis and comparison of the influence of illusions created by the imagination and the influence of passive affects on cognition, reasoning and action indicate their similar characteristics. Despite the appearance of inadequate and illusory imaginative ideas in experience – which, according to Spinoza, are impossible to remove – the cognition and awareness of their inadequacy and uncertainty strongly influence our judgment and inference and thereby weaken their influence. Similarly, in understanding passive or negative affects as indicators of a change in the state of the affected body and the ideas of such changes, we recognize these very often intense affects as inappropriate factors to guide us in judgment and action.

References

Kant, I. (1984). Kritika čistog uma. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Matice hrvatske.

Nadler, S. (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Parkinson, G. H. R. (1969). Language and Knowledge in Spinoza, Inquiry. 12 (1–4): 15–40.

Ravven, H. M. (2001). Some Thoughts on What Spinoza Learned from Maimonides on the Prophetic Imagination: Part Two: Spinoza’s Maimonideanism, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 39 (3): 385–406.

Ravven, H. M. (2012). Spinoza’s Rupture with Tradition – His Hints of a Jewish Modernity. U: Ravven, H. M., Goodman, L. E. Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy. (187–223). New York: State University of New York Press.

Ricoeur, P. (2024). Lectures on Imagination. University of Chicago Press.

Spinoza, B. (2006). Traktat o poboljšanju razuma. Zagreb: Izdanja Antibarbarus.

Spinoza, B. (2000). Etika: Dokazana geometrijskim redom. Zagreb: Demetra.

Spinoza, B. (2006). Teologijsko-politička rasprava, Zagreb: Demetra.

Savan, D. (1958). Spinoza and Language, The Philosophical Review. 67 (2): 212–225.

Shapiro, L. (2017). Affective Imaginative Associations. U: Melamed, Y. Y. Spinoza’s Ethics. A Critical Guide. (217–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sheldon, M. (1979). Spinoza, Imagination and Chaos, Southern Journal of Philosophy. 17 (1): 119–132.

Wolfson, H. A. (1961). The Philosophy of Spinoza. Tracing the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. New York: Harvard University Press.

Zovko, M. E. (2012). Naturalism and Intellectualism in Plato and Spinoza. U: Arndt, A., Zovko, J. (ur.). Freiheit und Determinismus (11–62). Erlangen: Wehrhahn.

Published

2025-09-04

Issue

Section

Original scientific paper