Learning through the prism of social constructivism

Authors

  • Jasmina Vrkić Dimić University of Zadar, Department of pedagogy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15291/ai.1250

Keywords:

communities of practice/learning, constructivism, context, informal learning, learning, learning principles, social constructivism, teaching

Abstract

In today's understanding of human development and learning is increasingly emphasized the importance of contextual, particularly social impacts, as well as their dynamic interactions between the individual and vice versa, individual to them. A dynamic co-construction of these relationships creates an individual, where he was an active actor in the dynamics of change occurring in him, but in the surrounding area. Knowledge, skills, competencies are constructed based on the existing human experience and the context in which learning occurs. Fundamental changes in learning and teaching are the transition to an open system of knowledge and the focus on the very processes of learning. Learning and teaching are opened and viewed in a much larger material, social and cultural context than those closely educational. All this requires a redefinition of the curriculum, creating an enabling environment for teaching and learning, but also changed the general approach in teacher education.A short review of current constructivist interpretation of learning and the context in which it occurs is presented in the paper. The particular emphasis is placed on social constructivism, communities of practice/learning and the informal forms of learning. The paper provides an overview of the revised perspective on learning through a series of seven principles, and, ultimately, the reflection theory of social constructionism to the practice of school learning and teaching, as well.

References

Babić, N. (2007): Konstruktivizam i pedagogija. Pedagogijska istraživanja. 4 (2), str. 217- 229.

Becker, H., Riel, M. (2000): Teacher Professional Engagement and Constructivist- Compatibile Computer Use. Teaching, Learning and Computing: 1998 National Survey, Report no. 7.; http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings.html

Doherty, R. W., Echevarria, J., Estrada, P., Goldenberg, C., Hilberg, R. S., Saunders, W. M., Tharp, R. G. (2002): Research Evidence: Five Standards for Effective Pedagogy and Student Outcomes. Tehnical Report No. 1, Santa Cruz: University of California, CREDE – Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Exelence; http://www.crede.org/tools/profdev/institute_pix.html

Eckert, P., Wenger, E. (1994): From school to Work: An Apprenticeship in Institutional Identity. Learning and Identity Series. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.;

http://www.ewenger.com/pub/Institutional_identity_wrd.doc

Gee, J. P. (2004): Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.

Gorodetsky, M., Keiny, S., Barak, J., Weiss, T. (2003): Contextual pedagogy: Teachers' journey beyond interdisciplinarity. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. Vol. 9., No. 1., pp 21-33.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., Weigel, M. (2007): Confronting the Chalenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation.; http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-

A3E0-4B89-AC9C-3807E1B0ae4e%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF

Jurić, V. (2007): Školsko (formalno), neformalno i informalno obrazovanje. u zborniku radova: Pedagogija – prema cjeloživotnom obrazovanju i društvu znanja. Svezak 1. Zagreb: Hrvatsko pedagogijsko društvo. str. 68-80.

Kretchmar, J. (2008): Seymour Papert & Constructionism. EBSCO Research Starters – Academic Topic Overviews. EBSCO Publising Inc., 5p; http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost//detailvid=14&hid=101&sid

Lacković-Grgin, K. (2006): Psihologija adolescencije. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.

PISA 2009; http://www.pisa.hr/index.php/2009-u-rh/glavno istrazivanje-2009

Resta, P., Christal, M., Ferneding, K., Kennedy Puthoff, A. (1999): CSCL as a Catalyst for Changing Teacher Practice. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 1999. Learning Technology Center – University of Texas, pp 488-495.

Saab, N., Van Joolingen, W., Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2005): Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology. No. 75., pp 603-621.; http://www.bpsjourlals.co.uk

Snyder, W., Wenger, E., Briggs, X. (2004): Communities of Practice in Government: Leveraging Knowledge for Performance. The Public Manager. Vol. 32. No. 4, pp 17-21

Suárez-Orozco, M., Sattin, C. (2007): Learning in the Global Era. in: Suárez-Orozco, M. /edit./: Learning in the Global Era – International Perspectives on Globalization and Education. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Ross Institute., pp. 1-43.

Terhart, E. (2003): Constructivism and teaching: a new paradigm in general didactics?. Journal of Curriculum Studies. Vol. 35., No. 1., pp 25-44.

Wenger, E. (1991): Communities of practice: where learning happens. Benchmark Magazine. Fall Issue.; http://www.ewenger.com/pub/pub_benchmark_wrd.doc

Wenger, E. (1996): Communities of practice – The Social Fabric of a Learning Organization. Health Care Forum Journal. Vol. 39, No. 4, pp 20-26.; http://www.ewenger.com/pub/pubhealthcareforum.htm

Wenger, E. (1998): Communities of practice: Learning as a Social System. Systems Thinker. Vol. 9. No. 5, pp 4-13.; http://ewenger.com/pub/pub_systems_thinker_wrd.doc

Wenger, E. (2004): Knowledge managment as doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal. 1, pp 1-8; http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com

Witfelt, C. (2000): Educational Multimedia And Teacher's Needs For New Competencies: A Study Of Compulsory School Teacher's Need For Competence To Use Educational Multimedia. EMI (Education Media International) – Euro Education. 37:4. pp 235-241. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals

Issue

Section

Preliminary communication