Rhetoric for Crowds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/csi.4442Keywords:
apostle, crowd, images, prestige, unconsciousAbstract
Gustave Le Bon’s eminent work The Crowd is considered as one of the fundamental works in mass psychology. Concurrently, the importance of this work and the impact it had on communication practices has been recently recognized by some of the scholars. While The Crowd primarily places focus on meticulous description of origin and psychological condition of the crowd, this paper suggests that, among others, Le Bon uses psychological discourse to define rhetorical precept that can be used as an agency for eliciting such condition. It is the purpose of this paper to extract and present the guidelines suggested by Le Bon in his work for mass oratory and corroborate it with apposite rhetorical theory in order to lend credibility to this thesis. Through broader treatment of rhetorical modes of pathos (state and language that induces it), orator, oration, and kairos (the right moment), with other hitherto rhetorical and linguistic insights, Le Bon constitutes activation means for evoking the psychological phenomena of the crowd. This paper represents Le Bon’s explicit and implicit rhetorical instructions in The Crowd by constructing the rhetorical model and indicating that his scholarly contribution was rhetorical as was psychological, suggesting consideration of his inclusion in the history of rhetoric and his contribution to the development of contemporary communication practices. This paper represents an interdisciplinary rhetorical model that engages the field of interest of various scientific disciplines, such as linguistics, rhetoric, communicology, public relations, and their subbranches.
Downloads
References
Amossy, Ruth. 2001. “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology”. Poetics Today, 22(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-22-1-1
Anderson, C. C. 1964. “The Psychology of the Metaphor”. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 105(1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1964.10533646
Antonakis, John, Nicolas Bastardoz, Philippe Jacquart, & Boas Shamir. 2016. “Charisma: An Ill-Defined and Ill-Measured Gift”. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1): 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062305
Aristotel. 1989. Retorika. Trans. M. Višić. Zagreb: Naprijed.
Aristotle. 1991. On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse . Trans. G. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benčić, Živa. 1995. “Antonomazija”. Tropi i figure. (Eds.) Živa Benčić & Dunja Fališevac. Zagreb: Zavod za znanost o književnosti Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu: 189–221.
Berger, Arthur Asa. 2011. Ads, fads, and consumer culture: Advertising’s impact on American character and society (4. ed). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub. Bizzell, Patricia. 2010. Rhetorical agendas: Political, ethical, spiritual. New York: Routledge.
Blair, J. Anthony. 2020. The persuasive ineffectiveness of arguing and arguments. OSSA Conference.
Bormann, Dennis R. 1977. “Enargeia: A Concept For All Seasons”. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies, 432: 155–159.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Što znači govoriti: Ekonomija jezičnih razmjena. Zagreb: Naprijed.
Brinton, Alan. 1988. “Pathos and the ‘Appeal to Emotion’: An Aristotelian Analysis”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5(3): 207–219.
Brockhaus, Richard R., Garry M. Hochberg. 1975. “The Generalization Argument Revisited”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 28(2): 123–129.
Brooks, G. P. 1976. “The faculty psychology of Thomas Reid”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12(1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(197601)12:1<65::AID-JHBS2300120108>3.0.CO;2-T
Brown, William R. 1989. “Two Traditions of Analogy”. Informal Logic, XI (3): 161–172.
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A grammar of motives. Oakland: University of California Press.
Campbell, George. 1988. The philosophy of rhetoric. (Ed.) Lloyd F. Bitzer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, Susan Schultz Huxman i Thomas R. Burkholder. 2015. The Rhetorical act: Thinking, speaking, and writing critically (Fifth edition). Stamford: Cengage Learning.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Childers, Jay P. 2012. “Le Bon and Early Twentieth Century Rhetoric”. American Society for the History of Rhetoric Conference.
Childers, Jay P. 2014. “Fear ing t he Masses: Gust ave Le Bon and Some Undemocratic Roots of Modern Rhetorical Studies”. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 17(1): 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2014.886932
Cialdini, Robert Beno. 2005. Influence: Science and practice (4. ed., 14. print). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Darwin, Charles. 1981. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dichter, Ernest. 1960. The Strategy of Desire. Garden City: Doubleday.
Ehninger, D. 1946. “Bernard Lami’s L’Art de Parler: A critical analysis”. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 32(4): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335634609381231
Ehninger, Douglas W. 1952. “Dominant trends in English rhetorical thought, 1750–1800”. The Southern Speech Journal, 18(1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417945209371243
Ehninger, Douglas. W. 1950. “George Campbell and the revolution in inventional theory”. The Southern Speech Journal, 15(4): 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417945009371140
Ehninger, Douglas. W. 1992. “On systems of rhetoric”. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25: 15–28.
Foucault, Michel . 2015. Hrabrost Istine. Zagreb: Sandorf & Mizantrop.
Freud, Sigmund. 1949. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego: Vol. 5th impression (J. Strachey, Trans.). London: The Hogarth Press.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Teenie Matlock. 2008. “Metaphor, imagination, and simulation”. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (1st ed.). (Ed.) Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 161–176.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Markus Tendahl. 2006. “Cognitive Effort and Effects in Metaphor Comprehension: Relevance Theory and Psycholinguistics”. Mind & Language, 21(3): 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00283.x
Gračanin, Đuro. 1968. Temelji Govorništva. Zagreb: Zrinski.
Green, Lawrence D. 2001. “Pathos”. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. (Ed.) Thomas O. Sloane. New York: Oxford University Press: 574–588.
Hume, David. 1896. A Treatise on Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jung, Carl Gustav & Marie Louise von Franz. 1964. Man and his symbols. New York: Doubleday.
Jung, Carl Gustav. 1980. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Juthe, Andre. 2005. “Argument by Analogy”. Argumentation, 19(1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9
Kišiček, Gabrijela. 2011. “Usporedba antičkoga i suvremenoga poimanja dobroga govornika”. Diacovensia: Teološki Prilozi, 19(1): 115–132.
Kolesarić, Vladimir. 2016. Status introspekcije u suvremenoj psihologiji. Zagreb: Alinea.
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
La Rochefoucauld, Francois de. 1959. The Maxims of La Rochefoucauld. Trans. L. Kronenberger. New York: Random House.
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.). (Ed.) Andrew Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 202–251.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2015. Metafore koje život znače . Trans. A. Ryznar. Zagreb: Disput.
Lanham, Richard Alan. 1991. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Le Bon, Gustave. 1896. The crowd—A study of the popular mind. Trans. T. Fisher Unwin. New York: MacMillan Co.
Le Bon, Gustave. 1899. The psychology of socialism. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Lindholm, Charles. 1990. Charisma (1. publ). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
McKay, Thomas. J. 1997. “Analogy and Argument”. Teaching Philosophy, 20(1): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil19972013
Meyer, Michel, Manuel Maria Carrilho & Benoit Timmermans. 2008. Povijest retorike od grka do naših dana . Trans. V. Mikšić. Zagreb: Disput.
Ohlberg, Mareike. 2015. “The era of crowds — Gustave Le Bon, crowd psychology, and conceptualizations of mass elite relations in China”. The dynamics of transculturality: Concepts and institutions in motion. (Eds.) Antje Flüchter & Jivanta Schöttli. New York: Springer: 157–187.
Patton, John H. 1975. “Experience and imagination: Approaches to rhetoric by John Locke and David Hume”. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 41(1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417947509372290
Pepper, Stephen C. 1927. “The Argument From Similarity”. The Philosophical Review, 36(6): 572–581.
Perloff, Richard. M. 2010. The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century (4th ed). New York: Routledge.
Radick, Gregory. 2002. “Darwin on Language and Selection”. Selection, 3(1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1556/Select.3.2002.1.2
Ramsey, Shawn D. 2017. “Gustave Le Bon, Rhetoric as Mass Contagion, and 19th Century Rhetoric”. Journal of Culture, English Language, Teaching & Literature, 17(2): 230–249.
Rowland, Robert C. 1987. “On Defining Argument”. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 20(3): 140–159.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2011. Course in general linguistics. Perry Meisel & Haun Saussy, Eds.; Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shopenhauer, Arthur. 2002. Eristička dijalektika: Umijeće kako uvijek biti u pravu objašnjeno u 38 trikova. Trans. Mladen Ivanišević. Split: Marjan Tisak.
Škarić, Ivo. 2000. Temeljci suvremenog govorništva. Zagreb: Školska Knjiga.
Spencer, Herbert. 1884. Philosophy of style. Appleton & Company. https://brittlebooks.library.illinois.edu/brittlebooks_open/Books2009- 09/spenhe0001phisty/spenhe0001phisty.pdf
Spencer, Martin E. 1973. “What Is Charisma?”. The British Journal of Sociology, 24(3): 341. https://doi.org/10.2307/588237
Stevenson, Angus i Christine A. Lindberg (Eds.). 2010. New Oxford American dictionary (3. ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walker, Jeffrey. 1994. “The Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme”. College English, 56(1): 46. https://doi.org/10.2307/378216
Waller, Bruce N. 2001. “Classifying and Analyzing Analogies”. Informal Logic, 21(3): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v21i3.2246
Walton, Douglas. 1990. “What is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?”. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(8): 399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026735
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer, Arthur E. 2017. “Origins of British Enlightenment rhetoric”. The Oxford handbook of rhetorical studies. (Ed.) Michael John MacDonald. New York: Oxford university press: 523–535.
Weber, Max. 1964. The theory of social and economic organization. Trans. Talcott Parson & A. M. Henderson. New York: The Free Press.
Weinsheimer, Joel. 2021. “The philosophy of rhetoric in Campbell’s philosophy of rhetoric”. Ideas, aesthetics, and inquiries in the early modern era. (Ed.) Kevin L. Cope. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press: 227–246.
Westen, Drew. 1999. “The Scientific Status of Unconscious Processes: Is Freud Really Dead?”. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47(4): 1061–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306519904700404
Weststeijm, Willem G. 1995. “Metafora: Teorija, analiza i interpretacija”. Tropi i figure. (Eds.) Živa. Benčić i Dunja Fališevac. Zagreb: Zavod za znanost o književnosti Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu: 131–151.
Žmavc, Janja. 2012. “The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: From Epieikeia to Auctoritas”. Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory Vol. 22. (Eds.) Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands: 181–191.
