Pregled razvoja teorija u proučavanju zadovoljstva stanovanjem

Autor(i)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15291/geoadria.1465

Ključne riječi:

teorija, zadovoljstvo, stanovanje

Sažetak

Zadovoljstvo stanovanjem jedan je od pokazatelja kvalitete života koji utječe na sve aspekte životnih dimenzija, od fizičkih, ekonomskih, socijalnih do psiholoških. Zbog svoje kompleksnosti, stanovanje se smatra interdisciplinarnim područjem istraživanja, pa različite struke koriste različite pristupe, koncepte, modele i mjere. Da bi neko istraživanje o stanovanju moglo biti sveobuhvatno, nužno je dati teorijski okvir u njegovom proučavanju. U velikom broju znanstvenih radova, istraživanja i projekata, teorije stanovanja često su nepotpuno objašnjene. Na temelju proučene recentne literature ovaj rad donosi pregled i sintezu najčešće korištenih teorija o zadovoljstvu stanovanja na jednom mjestu. To su teorija stambenog zadovoljstva na kojoj počiva model zadovoljstva stanovanjem, a polazi od subjektivnih percepcija; teorija stambene prilagodbe kao najcitiranija teorija u istraživanjima zadovoljstva stanovanjem; teorija stambene pokretljivosti koja poseban naglasak stavlja na stambeno okruženje kao važnog prediktora zadovoljstva stanovanjem; teorija formiranja impresija koja se upotrebljava pri ispitivanjima dojmova o fizičkim aspektima stambenog okoliša i fizičkoj strukturi zgrade/kuće; bihevioralna teorija kao najčešće korištena teorija u geografskom ispitivanju zadovoljstva stanovanjem; teorija hedonističkog ergometra kao najpoznatija teorija afektivnih iskustava; teorija aspiracijske spirale koja predviđa adaptacijske efekte; teorija troškova stanovanja koja zadovoljstvo stanovanjem povezuje s troškovima; funkcionalistička teorija koja je usmjerena ka društvenoj harmoniji; marksistička teorija prema kojoj svako biće ima pravo na adekvatno stanovanje neovisno o ekonomskom statusu i pozitivistička teorija stanovanja koja prednost daje objektivnom pristupu. Cilj pregleda navedenih teorija je njihovo sveobuhvatnije korištenje u istraživanjima zadovoljstva stanovanjem od mikro do makro razine. U radu je objašnjen koncept zadovoljstva stanovanjem i kritički osvrt za navedene teorije te su objašnjene njihove prednosti i nedostaci u istraživanjima zadovoljstva stanovanjem.

Reference

AMAO, L., F. (2012): Housing Quality in Informal Settlements and Urban Upgrading in Ibadan, Nigeria, Developing Country Studies 2, 10, 68-80. Dostupno na:

http://pakacademicsearch.com/pdf-files/edu/449/68-80%20Vol%202,%20No%2010%20(201

.pdf [28.02.2015.]

AMERIGO, M., ARAGONES, J. I. (1997): A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of environmental psychology, 17(1), 47-57.

ASCH, S. (1964): Forming Impressions of Personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.

BARTON, S. E. (1977): The Urban housing problem: Marxist theory and community organizing. Review of Radical Political Economics, 9(4), 16-30.

BALESTRA, C., SULTAN, J. (2013): Home Sweet Home: The Determinants of Residential Satisfaction and its Relation with Well-being, OECD Statistics Directorate Working Papers, OECD. Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/18152031

BHADA, P., HOORNWEG, D. (2009): The Global City Indicators Program: A More Credible Voice for Cities. Washington, DC: World Bank, Urban Development Unit.

BISWAS-DIENER, R., VITTERSØ, J., & DIENER, E. (2005): Most people are pretty happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish, and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205–226.

BRETT, J. M. (1982): Job transfer and well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(4), 450-463.

BRICKMAN, P., CAMPBELL, D. T. (1971): Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H.Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium, New York: Academic Press, 287-302.

BROWN, L. A., LONGBRAKE, D., B. (1970): Migration flows in intra-urban space: place utility considerations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60, 368-84.

BROWN, L., A., MOORE, E., G. (1970): The intra-urban migration process: A perspective. Geografiska Annaler B, 52 (1), 1-13.

BRUMMELL, A. C. (1977): A Theory of Intraurban Residential Mobility Behaviour, pp. 146.

BUCKENBERGER, C. (2009): Housing qualities in suburban Auckland – the suburban „pavlova“ paradise? In: Proceedings of Asia Pacific Network of Housing Research (APNHR) Conference and Australasian Housing Researchers Conference (AHRC), Sydney, Australia.

CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P., E., RODGERS, W., L. (1976): The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations and satisfaction, New York: Rusell Sage Foundation. pp. 573.

CARMONA, M. (2001): Housing Design Quality, Taylor & Francis. pp. 382.

CARTER, H. (1995): The Study of Urban Geography. Arnold. pp. 420.

CLARK, W., A., V., CADWALLDER, M. (1973): Location stress and residental mobility. Environment and Behaviour, 29-41.

COX, T., FERGUSON, E. (1991): Individual Differences, Stress and Coping. In C.L. Cooper, & R. Payne (Eds.). Personality and Stress: Individual Differences in the Stress Process. Wiley. 5-14.

CUMMINS, R. A. (2000): Personal income and subjective well‐being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133‐158.

DIAZ-SERRANO, L. (2006): Housing satisfaction, homeownership and housing mobility: A panel data analysis for twelve EU countries. IZA Discussion Papers, NO. 2318.

DIENER, E., SELIGMAN, M., E., P. (2004): Beyond Money: Toward and Economy of Well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 5, 1, 1-31.

DIENER, E., LUCAS, E., R., SCOLLON, N., C. (2006): Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill, Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being. American Psyhologist, Vol. 62, No. 4, 305-314.

DIENER, E., SANDVIK, E., SEIDLITZ, L., DIENER, M. (1993): The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28, 195-223.

EASTERLIN, R. A. (1974): Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economics growth, New York: American Press, 89-125.

FIDZANI, L., STEGGELL, C., D., YAMAMOTO, T., BRYANT, K. (2015): The use of Theory in Housing Research, Housing and Society, vol. 33, 5-20.

FORDYCE, M. W. (1972): ‘Happiness, its daily variation and its relation to values’, Dissertation Abstracts International 33, 1266B (University Microfilms No. 72-23, 491).

FRANSCESCATO, G., WEIDEMMAN, S., ANDERSON, J. R. (1989): Evaluating the built environment from the users point of view: An attitudinal model. In: W.F.E. Preiser (ed.) Building Evaluation, London: Prenum Press, 181–198.

FRANKLIN, B. (2001): Discourses of Design: Perspectives on the Meaning of Housing Quality and Good Housing Design, Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 18. 79-92.

FRIED, M. (1966): Grieving for a Lost Home: Psychological Costs of Relocation, In James Q. Wilson (ed.), Urban Renewal: The Record and the Controversy, Cambridge: MIT Press, 359-379.

GALSTER, G. (1987): Identifying the correlates of dwelling satisfaction: An empirical critique. Environmental and Behavior, 19 (5), 539-568.

GOODCHILD, B. (1997): Housing and the urban environment: a quide to housing design, renewal and urban planning, Oxford. pp. 211.

HELBURN, N. (1982): Presidential Address: Geography and the Quality of Life: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72, 445-456.

HOBFOLL, S., F., SCHWARZER, R., CHON, K., K. (1998): Disentangling the stress labyrinth: Interpreting the meaning of the term stress as it is studied in healta context. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 11, 181-212.

JACKSON, P., SMITH, S. J. (1984): Exploring social geography, London: Allen&Unwin.

KAHNEMAN, D. (2000): Experienced utility and objective happiness: A momentbased approach. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.) Choices, values and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 673-692.

KING, P. (1996): The Limits of Housing Policy: a Philosophical Investigation. London, Middlesex University Press. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 189-192.

KELLER, T. C., FARR, C. A., KIRBY, S. D., RISCO, J. (1997): Housing and its influence on life and job satisfaction among clergy. Housing and Society, 24, 15-34.

KEMENY, J. (1992): Housing and Social Theory, London, Routledge. pp. 192.

KNOX, P., L. (1975): Social Well-Being: A Spatial Perspective, London: Oxford University Press. pp. 60.

KROFTA, J., MORRIS, E. W., FRANKLIN, E. (1994): Housing health and the needs for help in older households: Differences among age cohorts. Housing and Society, 21, 76-89.

LAWRENCE, R., J. (1995): Housing Quality: An Agenda for Research. Urban Studies, 32 (10), 1655-1664.

LU, M. (1999): Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs. Regression Models, Growth and Change (30) 264-87.

LUTZ-STRULIK, H., VALE, R. (2002): Preservation of Architectural Heritage through Adaptive Reuse and Its Value for a Sustainable Environment. Paper presented at the Southern Crossings – Whaka whitiwhiti au Tonga Sixth Australasian Urban History Planning History Conference, Auckland, 13-16 February 2002.

MATTIKA, L., M. (2001): Service oriented assessment of quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities. Dissertation of Finnish Association of Mental Retardation (Electronic version), from http://acta.uta.fi [09.03.2015.]

MILETIĆ, G. M. (2012): U potrazi za drugim prostorom - sociologijski aspekti sekundarnog stanovanja u Hrvatskoj, Društvena istraživanja, 21, (3), 795-815.

MOHIT, M. A., IBRAHIM, M., RASHID, Y. R. (2010): Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(1), 18-27. Dostupno na: http://irep.iium.edu.my/3157/1/sdarticle.pdf [09.03.2015.]

MORRIS, E. W., WINTER, M. (1966): Housing. Family, and Society, New York: Wiley and Sons.

MORRIS, E. W., WINTER, M. (1975): A Theory of family housing adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 79-88.

MURDIE, R., A., RHYNE, D., BATES, J. (1992): Modeling Quality of Life Indicators in Canada: A Feasibility Analysis, Institute of Social Research, York University, Toronto, pp. 14-59.

NAKAZATO, N., SCHIMMACK, U., OISHI, S. (2010): Effect of Changes in Living Conditions on Well-Being: A Prospective Top–Down Bottom–Up Model. Social Indicators Research 100 (1):115-135.

PACIONE, M. (1986): Quality of life in Glasgow: an applied geographical analysis. Environment & Planning, A 18, 1499-1520.

PENNINGTON, D. C. (2004): Osnove socijalne psihologije. Jastrebarsko. Naklada Slap, pp. 336.

REBERNIK, D. (2002): Urbano-geografsko proučavanje blokovskih stanovanjskih sosesk kot element urbanističnega planiranja, Dela 18, 463-475.

REX, J., MOORE, R. (1967): Race, Community and Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 36-275.

ROGIĆ, I. (1990): Stanovati i biti – Rasprave iz sociologije stanovanja, Zagreb, Sociološko društvo Hrvatske, pp. 180.

SAUNDERS, P., WILLIAMS, P. (1988): The Constitution of the Home: Towards a Research Agenda, Housing Studies Vol 3, No2, 81-93.

SCHIMMACK, U. (2001): Pleasure, displeasure and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive?, Cognition and Emotion, 15, 81-97.

SCHIMMACK, U., COLCOMBE, S. (2007): Eliciting mixed feelings with the paired-picture paradigm: a tribute to Kellogg. Cognition and Emotion, 21(7), 1546-1553.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930601057011

SIDI, S., SHARIPAH, N. (2011): Quality affordable housing: A theoretical framework for planning and design of quality housing. Journal of Techno-Social 2, no. 1, 1-10, Dostupno na:

http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/577/1/JTS21_F1.pdf [01.03.2015.]

SIMON, H. (1957): Models of Man, New York. Wiley.

SKARBURSKIS, A., MOOS, M. (2008): The redistribution of residental property values in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. Examining neoclassical and Marxist views on chonging investment patterns, Environment and Planning, 40, 905-927.

SOMMERVILLE, P., CHAN, C. (2001): Human dignity and the ‘third way’: the case of housing policy, paper presented at the Housing Studies Association conference on ‘Housing Imaginations: new concepts, new theories, new researchers, University of Cardiff, Cardiff.

STEGGEL, C. D., BINDER, S. K., DAVIDSON, L. A., VEGA, P. H., HUTTON, E. D., RODECAP, A. R. (2001): The Role of Theory in the Study of Housing, Housing and Society, Vol. 28, 1-2. Dostupno na: http://www.housingeducators.org/Journals/H&S_Vol_28_1&2_The_Role_of_Theory_in_theStudy_of_Housing.pdf [06.03.2015.]

STOKOLS, D., SHUMAKER, S. A. (1982): The psychological context of residential mobility and well-being, Journal of Social Issues, 38, 149-171.

STUTZER, A. (2004): The role of income aspirations in individual happines, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 54 (1), 89-109.

SOLIMAN, A. M. (2004): A possible way out: Formalizing housing informality in Egyptian cities, University Press of America, pp. 312.

ŠPES, M. (1998): Degradacija okolja kot dejavnik diferenciacije urbane pokrajine. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 30, pp. 186.

ŠILJEG, S. (2016): Vrednovanje kvalitete stanovanja u Zadru, Doktorska disertacija, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Geografski odsjek, Zagreb, pp. 400.

VELLA-BRODRICK, D., A. (2007): Orientations to happiness as predictors of subjective well-being. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Conference on Quality of Life. MacKay, Y. (ed.). Australia: Deakin University, Vol. Online, p. 1 - 11 11 p.

VEENHOVEN, R. (2006): World Database of Happiness: Continous register of scientific research on subjective enjoyment of life. Erasmus University Rotterdam, dostupno na: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl [01.11.2016.]

WEIDEMANN, S., ANDERSON, J. (1985): A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. In: I. Altman i C. Werner, (ur.) Home Environments, New York, Plenum, 153-182.

WESSMAN, A. E., RICKS, D. F. (1966): Mood and Personality (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), 6, 2-16.

WILSON, T. D., GILBERT, D. T. (2008): Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 370-386.

WOLPERT, J. (1965): Behavioral Aspect of the Decision to Migrate. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01947871. [06.03.2015.]

Preuzimanja

Objavljeno

26.07.2018.

Broj časopisa

Svezak 23 Br. 1 (2018)

Rubrika

Pregledni rad

Licenca

Autori se trebaju potruditi napisati u potpunosti izvorni rad, a ako su koristili rad i/ili riječi drugih, precizno prenijeti citiranja ili navođenja. Plagijati u svim oblicima predstavljaju  neetičko izdavačko ponašanje koje nije prihvatljivo. Plagijati se pojavljuju u mnogo oblika, od “podvaljivanja” tuđih radova kao autorovih vlastitih, prepisivanja ili parafraziranja bitnih  dijelova tuđih radova (bez navođenja izvornih autora) do prisvajanja rezultata tuđih  istraživanja. Autori se obvezuju ishoditi dozvolu od nositelja autorskih prava za objavljivanje ilustracija, fotografija, tablica i sličnih materijala zaštićenih zakonima o autorskim pravima. Materijale zaštićene autorskim pravima dopušteno je reproducirati jedino uz odgovarajuće dopuštenje i zahvalu.