Informacijska pismenost u okruženju Weba 2.0
novi pravci i težišta istraživanja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v7i1.197Ključne riječi:
informacijska pismenost, web 2.0, društveni mediji, istraživačke temeSažetak
Iako se informacijska pismenost u svojoj pojmovnoj okosnici, koju čine etičko pronalaženje, korištenje i stvaranje informacija, nije značajno mijenjala od uvođenja same koncepcije, korjenite promjene u korištenju informacija i modalitetima ulaženja u interakciju s informacijama dovele su do preispitivanja donedavno čvrstih i stabilnih pojmovnih okvira ovoga koncepta.Informacijska je pismenost oduvijek bila određena i definirana informacijskim okruženjem. Stoga ne iznenađuje da su se polazišta informacijske pismenosti počela mijenjati pojavom Weba 2.0, koji je pridonio složenosti i nestrukturiranosti informacijskih okruženja. Sukus promjena čini odmak od pretraživanja i pronalaženja informacija te naglašavanje vrednovanja i korištenja/priopćavanja informacija. U radu se informacijska pismenost razmatra u odnosu na promjene potaknute tehnologijama Weba 2.0, prikazuje se koncept „informacijska pismenost 2.0“ i komentiraju novi istraživačke pravce, težišta i teme iznjedrene promjenama u informacijskom okruženju.
Preuzimanja
Reference
ACRL. 2000. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Accessed June 25, 2012.http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
ALA. 1989. Final Report, American Library Association Presidential Commission on Information Literacy. Accessed June 25, 2012. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm.
Bawden, D. 2001. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation 57(2), 218-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083
Bawden, D. and Robinson, L. 2009. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of information science 35 (2), 180-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781
Borgman, C. 2007. Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Brabazon, T. 2006. The Google Effect: Googling, Blogging, Wikis and the Flattening of Expertise. Libri 56 (3), 157-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2006.157
Brabazon, T. 2011. Take the Red Pill: A New Matrix of Literacy. Journal of media literacy education 2 (3), 209-229.
Bruce, C. S. 2000. Information literacy research: dimensions of the emerging collective consciousness. Australian academic and research libraries 31 (2), 91-109.
CILIP. 2004. Information literacy. Accessed June 25, 2012. http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/advocacy/information-literacy/pages/definition.aspx.
Dede, C. 2008. A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE review (May/June), 80-81. Accessed August 2, 2012. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0837.pdf.
Eysenbach, G. 2007. From intermediation to disintermediation and apomediation: new models for consumers to access and assess the credibility of health information in the age of Web2.0. In Medinfo 2007 – Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics – Building Sustainable Health System, edited by Kuhn et al., 163-166. IOS Press.
Farkas, M. 2011. Technology in Practice: Information Literacy 2.0. American Libraries. Accessed July 2, 2012.: http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/columns/practice/information-literacy-20.
Farkas, M. 2012. Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy. Library Hi Tech 30 (1), 82-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213229
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. and Hughes, J. E. 2009. Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now? Educational researcher 38, 246-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671
Hapke, T. 2007. Informationskompetenz 2.0 und das Verschwinden des Nutzers. Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 31 (2), 137-148.
Hargittai, E. et al. 2010. Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content. International journal of communication 4. Accessed July 10, 2012. http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/636/423.
Huvila, I. 2011. The Complete Information Literacy? Unforgetting Creation and Organisation of Information. Journal of librarianship and information science 43 (4), 237-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000611418812
Jessen, J. and Jørgensen A. H. 2012. Aggregated trustworthiness: Redefining online credibility through social validation. First Monday 17 (1). Accessed June 30, 2012. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3731/3132. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i1.3731
Lloyd, A. 2006. Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture. Journal of documentation 62 (5), 570-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410610688723
Mackey, T. P. and Jacobson, T. E. 2011. Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries 72 (1), 62-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
Markless, S. 2009. A New Conception of Information Literacy for the Digital Learning Environment in Higher Education. Nordic journal of information literacy in higher education 1 (1), 25-40.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. and Medders, R. B. 2010. Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online. Journal of communication 60 (3), 413-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
OCLC. 2004. Information Format Trends: Content, Not Containers. Accessed May 19, 2012. http://www.oclc.org/reports/2004format.htm.
Owusu-Ansah, E. K. 2003. Information Literacy and the academic library: a critical look at the concept and the controversies surrounding it. Journal of academic librarianship 29 (4), 219-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(03)00040-5
RIN. 2008. Mind the skills gap: information-handling training for researchers. Accessed April 28, 2012. http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/researcher-development-and-skills/mind-skills-gap-information-handling-training-researchers.
SCONUL Working Group of Information Literacy. 2011. The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy. A research Lens for Higher Education. Accessed June 30, 2012. http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/publications/researchlens.pdf.
Shapiro, J. J. and Hughes, S. K. 1996. Information technology as a liberal art. Educom review 31 (2), 31-6.
Snavely, L. and Cooper, N. 1997. The information literacy debate. Journal of academic librarianship 23 (1), 7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(97)90066-5
Sundin, O. 2008. Negotiations on information-seeking expertise: A study of web-based tutorials for information literacy. Journal of documentation 64 (1), 24-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844141
Špiranec, S. and Banek Zorica, M. 2012. Changing anatomies of Information Literacy at the postgraduate level: refinements of models and shifts in assessment. Nordic journal of information literacy in higher education 4 (1), 3-15.
Špiranec, S. and Banek Zorica, M. 2010. Information Literacy 2.0: hype or discourse refinement? Journal of documentation 66 (1), 140-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411011016407
Streatfield, D., Allan, D. and Wilson, T. 2010. Information literacy training for postgraduate and postdoctoral researchers: a national survey and its implications. Libri: international journal of libraries and information services 60 (3), 230-240.
Stoecklin, N. 2012. Informations- und Kommunikationskompetenz – das «Lesen und Schreiben» der ICT-Kultur. Medienpaedagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung. Accessed August 2, 2012. http://www.medienpaed.com/2012/stoecklin1206.pdf.
Tuominen, K. 2007. Information literacy 2.0. Signum 40 (5), 6-12.
Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D. and Rosen D. 2008. We're all stars now: Reality television, Web 2.0, and mediated identities. In The proceedings of ACM's nineteenth annual hypertext and hypermedia, 107-112. New York: ACM.
Schiltz, M., Truyen, F. and Coppens, H. 2007. Cutting the Trees of Knowledge: Social Software, Information Architecture, and Their Epistemic Consequences. Thesis Eleven 89 (1), 94-114.
Zurkowski, P. G. 1974. The information service environment: Relationships and priorities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Accessed April 28, 2012: ERIC database (ED 100391).
Preuzimanja
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
This work is licensed under a KreativniCommons Attribution-NonCommercial Međunarodne licence.
