RIZIK – anketno istraživanje o upravljanju rizicima u hrvatskim muzejima u svrhu bolje procjene, prevencije i smanjenja rizika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.3475Ključne riječi:
dugoročna zaštita, kulturna baština, procjena rizika, šteta uzrokoSažetak
Cilj. Cilj anketnog istraživanja o upravljanju rizicima u hrvatskim muzejima bio je prikupljanje sveobuhvatnih podataka o spremnosti hrvatskih kulturnih institucija na različite vrste rizika u svrhu bolje procjene, prevencije i smanjenja rizika.
Pristup i metodologija. Nakon razornih šteta koje je potres u ožujku 2020. prouzročio na kulturnoj baštini u Zagrebu, Međunarodni institut za restauraciju povijesnih i umjetničkih djela, IIC – Hrvatska grupa, proveo je nacionalno istraživanje pod nazivom RIZIK. Mrežna anketa sastojala se od 73 pitanja podijeljena u četiri kategorije: opće informacije o instituciji, o imovini, uključujući građevinu u kojoj su smješteni muzej i zbirke te pitanja o financijama i posjetiteljima. Sastavni dio ankete činila su pitanja o sigurnosti i redovitom održavanju muzejskih prostora, radnim i poslovnim planovima, hitnim službama u slučaju opasnosti, mogućim opasnostima i rizicima koji utječu na građevinsku imovinu i zbirku, kao i pitanja o mjerama koje mogu pomoći u sprječavanju ili smanjenju rizika i štete na zbirkama, građevinskoj imovini, osoblju i posjetiteljima.
Rezultati. Ukupno 188 muzeja pozvano je na sudjelovanje u anketi, a odgovorilo ih je više od 100 premda su neki na pitanja odgovorili samo djelomično. Ovaj rad prikazuje presjek općeg stanja u hrvatskim muzejima, bavi se problemom modernizacije izložbenih prostora i čuvaonica, opisuje ideju istraživanja putem ankete RIZIK te razmatra rezultate ankete i mogućnosti unapređenja.
Originalnost/vrijednost. Anketa RIZIK prvo je anketno istraživanje na temu upravljanja rizicima upućeno svim muzejima na području Republike Hrvatske. Prikupljeni su podaci okvirni pokazatelj trenutačnog stanja i standarda koji se primjenjuju u hrvatskim muzejima, galerijama i zbirkama. Sudionici ankete na osnovu dobivenih rezultata mogu identificirati područja u kojima postoji prostor za unapređenje ili promjenu pristupa radu, organizaciji i
daljnjem planiranju.
Preuzimanja
Reference
Brokerhof, Agnes, Bart Ankersmit, and Frank Ligterink. 2016. Risk Management for Collections. Amersfoort: Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands.
Brokerhof, Agnes, Tessa Luger, Bart Ankersmit, Frank Bergevoet, Robert Schillemans, Peter Schoutens, Tine Muller, Judikje Kiers, Garnet Muething, and Robert Waller. 2005. “Risk Assessment of Museum Amstelkring: Application to an Historic Building and Its Collections and the Consequences for Preservation Management.” ICOM Committee for Conservation 14th Triennial Meeting The Hague 12-16 September 2005, 590–96.
Canadian Conservation Institute. 1995. “Emergency Preparedness for Cultural Institutions: Introduction.” CCI Notes 14 (1).
Damjanović, Dragan. 2020. “Update: Rebuilding Zagreb after the 2020 Earthquake.” News in Conservation 79 (August-September): 16–20.
Damjanović, Dragan. 2021. Veliki zagrebački potresi (Great Zagreb Earthquakes). Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
Henderson, Jane and Tanya Nakamoto. 2016. “Dialogue in Conservation Decision-Making.” Studies in Conservation 61 (sup2): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2016.1183106.
Ljubić Tobisch, Valentina. 2016. “Gefahrstoffe in Museumsobjekten – Erhaltung Oder Entsorgung?” In Gefahrstoffe in Museumsobjekten. Erhaltung Oder Entsorgung?, edited by Martina Wetzenkircher, Valentina Ljubić Tobisch, Anke Schäning, and Sigrid Eyb-Green, 9–21. Wien: Technisches Museum Wien.
Michalski, Stefan. 1990. “An Overall Framework for Preventive Conservation and Remedial Conservation.” In ICOM Committee for Conservation, 9th Triennial Meeting, edited by Kirsten Grimstad, 589–91. Paris: ICOM Committee for Conservation.
Pavić, Mirta. 2020. “Consequences of Unprecedented Earthquake in Zagreb.” News in Conservation April-May (77): 14–16.
Pedersoli, Jr. José Luiz, Catherine Antomarchi and Stefan Michalski. 2016. “A Guide to Risk Management of Cultural Heritage.” ICCROM, Canadian Conservation Institute.
Podany, Jerry. 2017. When Galleries Shake: Earthquake Damage Mitigation for Museum Collections. Getty Publications.
Podany, Jerry. 2020. “What Can We Learn.” News in Conservation April-May (77): 16–17.
Poggendorf, Renate. 2010. “Handle with Care! Gedanken Zur Präventiven Konservierung an Museen.” Beiträge Zur Erhaltung von Kunst- Und Kulturgut, 2010.
Prislan, Jana Subic, Estera Cerar, and Vesna Zivkovic. 2014. “Who Cares? We Do – A Nationwide Survey of Museum Storage in Slovenia.” Paris: International Council of Museums ICOM-CC 17.
Rose, Carolyn L., Catharine Hawks, and Robert Waller. 2019. “A Preventive Conservation Approach to the Storage of Collections.” In Preventive Conservation: Collection Storage, edited by Lisa Elkin and Christopher A. Norris, 43–55. Society for the Preservation of Natural History; American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works; Smithsonian Institution; The George Washington University Museum Studies Program.
Ryhl-Svendsen, Morten and David Thickett. 1971. “Indoor Air Quality,” 1–144.
Soley, Gisela. 2017. “Risk and Contingency Plan M6.” In INTERMODEL EU Simulation Using Building Information Modelling Methodology of Multimodal, Multipurpose and Multiproduct Freight Railway Terminal Infrastructures, 43. Inovation and networks executive agency, Transport Research - H2020 programme.
Trust, Birmingham Museums. 2012. “Risk Awareness Profiling Tool.” https://www.rapton-line.org.uk/welcome.asp.
Waller, Robert. 1994. “Conservation Risk Assessment: A Strategy for Managing Resources for Preventive Conservation.” Studies in Conservation 39 (sup2): 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1994.39.Supplement-2.12.
Waller, Robert. 2019. “Collection Risk Assessment.” In Preventive Conservation: Collection Storage, edited by Lisa Elkin and Christopher A. Norris, 59–90. Society for the Preservation of Natural History; American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works; Smithsonian Institution; The George Washington University Museum Studies Program.
Will, Thomas and Hans-Rudolf Meier. 2007. “Cultural Heritage and Natural Disasters: Risk Preparedness and the Limits of Prevention.” In Cultural Heritage and Natural Disasters Risk Preparedness and the Limits of Prevention, edited by Birgit Finger, Hans-Rudolf Meier and Thomas Will, 9–20. Leipzig: ICOMOS-International Council on Monuments and Sites.
Preuzimanja
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Autorska prava (c) 2022 Valentina Ljubić Tobisch, Mirta Pavić , Jasna Širec, Žana Matulić Bilač

This work is licensed under a KreativniCommons Attribution-NonCommercial Međunarodne licence.


