RIZIK – anketno istraživanje o upravljanju rizicima u hrvatskim muzejima u svrhu bolje procjene, prevencije i smanjenja rizika

Autor(i)

  • Valentina Ljubić Tobisch Art / Conservation / Science, Vienna, Austria
  • Mirta Pavić Conservation Department, The Museum of Contemporary Art Zagreb, Croatia
  • Jasna Širec Quality Control Department, TEVA Pliva, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Žana Matulić Bilač Conservation Department of Split, Croatian Conservation Institute, Split, Croatia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.3475

Ključne riječi:

dugoročna zaštita, kulturna baština, procjena rizika, šteta uzroko

Sažetak

Cilj. Cilj anketnog istraživanja o upravljanju rizicima u hrvatskim muzejima bio je prikupljanje sveobuhvatnih podataka o spremnosti hrvatskih kulturnih institucija na različite vrste rizika u svrhu bolje procjene, prevencije i smanjenja rizika.
Pristup i metodologija. Nakon razornih šteta koje je potres u ožujku 2020. prouzročio na kulturnoj baštini u Zagrebu, Međunarodni institut za restauraciju povijesnih i umjetničkih djela, IIC – Hrvatska grupa, proveo je nacionalno istraživanje pod nazivom RIZIK. Mrežna anketa sastojala se od 73 pitanja podijeljena u četiri kategorije: opće informacije o instituciji, o imovini, uključujući građevinu u kojoj su smješteni muzej i zbirke te pitanja o financijama i posjetiteljima. Sastavni dio ankete činila su pitanja o sigurnosti i redovitom održavanju muzejskih prostora, radnim i poslovnim planovima, hitnim službama u slučaju opasnosti, mogućim opasnostima i rizicima koji utječu na građevinsku imovinu i zbirku, kao i pitanja o mjerama koje mogu pomoći u sprječavanju ili smanjenju rizika i štete na zbirkama, građevinskoj imovini, osoblju i posjetiteljima.

Rezultati. Ukupno 188 muzeja pozvano je na sudjelovanje u anketi, a odgovorilo ih je više od 100 premda su neki na pitanja odgovorili samo djelomično. Ovaj rad prikazuje presjek općeg stanja u hrvatskim muzejima, bavi se problemom modernizacije izložbenih prostora i čuvaonica, opisuje ideju istraživanja putem ankete RIZIK te razmatra rezultate ankete i mogućnosti unapređenja.
Originalnost/vrijednost. Anketa RIZIK prvo je anketno istraživanje na temu upravljanja rizicima upućeno svim muzejima na području Republike Hrvatske. Prikupljeni su podaci okvirni pokazatelj trenutačnog stanja i standarda koji se primjenjuju u hrvatskim muzejima, galerijama i zbirkama. Sudionici ankete na osnovu dobivenih rezultata mogu identificirati područja u kojima postoji prostor za unapređenje ili promjenu pristupa radu, organizaciji i
daljnjem planiranju.

Preuzimanja

Nema statistike

Biografije autora

  • Valentina Ljubić Tobisch, Art / Conservation / Science, Vienna, Austria

    Valentina Ljubić Tobisch holds an academic title in physical chemistry and graduated in metal conservation. From 2003 to 2017 she worked at the Technisches Museum Wien in Vienna, Austria, and from 2010 to 2013 she worked as a Senior Lecturer at the Arts Academy in Split, Croatia. She was awarded the TÜV Austria Science Prize for the development of the strategy for the treatment of museum objects containing asbestos. In 2021, she was granted a research project by the Austrian Academy of Sciences in the field of early photography and electrotyping. She currently works at the Technische Universität in Vienna.

  • Mirta Pavić , Conservation Department, The Museum of Contemporary Art Zagreb, Croatia

    Mirta Pavić is the Head of the Conservation Department of the Museum of Contemporary Art (MSU) in Zagreb, Croatia. She received her M.A. in Conservation from the Academy of Fine Arts and Design, University of Ljubljana. Mirta also teaches a compulsory course on modern and contemporary art conservation at the Arts Academy, University of Split and is a visiting lecturer at the Academy of Fine Arts and Design in Ljubljana. She is a member of the ICOM-CC working group Modern Materials and Contemporary Art, a coordinator of the Conservation Section and a member of the Executive Committee of the Croatian Museum Association (CMA).

  • Jasna Širec, Quality Control Department, TEVA Pliva, Zagreb, Croatia

    Jasna Širec is an analyst employed in the Quality Control Department of TEVA Pliva in Zagreb, Croatia, where she performs laboratory analyses of pharmaceutical products. A graduate engineer of chemical technology, she completed her university studies at the Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana.

  • Žana Matulić Bilač , Conservation Department of Split, Croatian Conservation Institute, Split, Croatia

    Žana Matulić Bilač worked for the Ministry of Culture from 1990 to 2006 and since then at the Croatian Conservation Institute. Since 1997 she has been engaged as a professor at the Art Academy in Split. She restored some of the most complex Medieval polychrome sculptures, icons, and painted crosses in Croatia. She earned her BA degree from the University of Split, going on to study at the Academy of Fine Arts in Ljubljana. She is currently a PhD student of Art History at the University of Zadar. She is the current president of the IIC - Croatian group.

Reference

Brokerhof, Agnes, Bart Ankersmit, and Frank Ligterink. 2016. Risk Management for Collections. Amersfoort: Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands.

Brokerhof, Agnes, Tessa Luger, Bart Ankersmit, Frank Bergevoet, Robert Schillemans, Peter Schoutens, Tine Muller, Judikje Kiers, Garnet Muething, and Robert Waller. 2005. “Risk Assessment of Museum Amstelkring: Application to an Historic Building and Its Collections and the Consequences for Preservation Management.” ICOM Committee for Conservation 14th Triennial Meeting The Hague 12-16 September 2005, 590–96.

Canadian Conservation Institute. 1995. “Emergency Preparedness for Cultural Institutions: Introduction.” CCI Notes 14 (1).

Damjanović, Dragan. 2020. “Update: Rebuilding Zagreb after the 2020 Earthquake.” News in Conservation 79 (August-September): 16–20.

Damjanović, Dragan. 2021. Veliki zagrebački potresi (Great Zagreb Earthquakes). Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.

Henderson, Jane and Tanya Nakamoto. 2016. “Dialogue in Conservation Decision-Making.” Studies in Conservation 61 (sup2): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2016.1183106.

Ljubić Tobisch, Valentina. 2016. “Gefahrstoffe in Museumsobjekten – Erhaltung Oder Entsorgung?” In Gefahrstoffe in Museumsobjekten. Erhaltung Oder Entsorgung?, edited by Martina Wetzenkircher, Valentina Ljubić Tobisch, Anke Schäning, and Sigrid Eyb-Green, 9–21. Wien: Technisches Museum Wien.

Michalski, Stefan. 1990. “An Overall Framework for Preventive Conservation and Remedial Conservation.” In ICOM Committee for Conservation, 9th Triennial Meeting, edited by Kirsten Grimstad, 589–91. Paris: ICOM Committee for Conservation.

Pavić, Mirta. 2020. “Consequences of Unprecedented Earthquake in Zagreb.” News in Conservation April-May (77): 14–16.

Pedersoli, Jr. José Luiz, Catherine Antomarchi and Stefan Michalski. 2016. “A Guide to Risk Management of Cultural Heritage.” ICCROM, Canadian Conservation Institute.

Podany, Jerry. 2017. When Galleries Shake: Earthquake Damage Mitigation for Museum Collections. Getty Publications.

Podany, Jerry. 2020. “What Can We Learn.” News in Conservation April-May (77): 16–17.

Poggendorf, Renate. 2010. “Handle with Care! Gedanken Zur Präventiven Konservierung an Museen.” Beiträge Zur Erhaltung von Kunst- Und Kulturgut, 2010.

Prislan, Jana Subic, Estera Cerar, and Vesna Zivkovic. 2014. “Who Cares? We Do – A Nationwide Survey of Museum Storage in Slovenia.” Paris: International Council of Museums ICOM-CC 17.

Rose, Carolyn L., Catharine Hawks, and Robert Waller. 2019. “A Preventive Conservation Approach to the Storage of Collections.” In Preventive Conservation: Collection Storage, edited by Lisa Elkin and Christopher A. Norris, 43–55. Society for the Preservation of Natural History; American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works; Smithsonian Institution; The George Washington University Museum Studies Program.

Ryhl-Svendsen, Morten and David Thickett. 1971. “Indoor Air Quality,” 1–144.

Soley, Gisela. 2017. “Risk and Contingency Plan M6.” In INTERMODEL EU Simulation Using Building Information Modelling Methodology of Multimodal, Multipurpose and Multiproduct Freight Railway Terminal Infrastructures, 43. Inovation and networks executive agency, Transport Research - H2020 programme.

Trust, Birmingham Museums. 2012. “Risk Awareness Profiling Tool.” https://www.rapton-line.org.uk/welcome.asp.

Waller, Robert. 1994. “Conservation Risk Assessment: A Strategy for Managing Resources for Preventive Conservation.” Studies in Conservation 39 (sup2): 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1994.39.Supplement-2.12.

Waller, Robert. 2019. “Collection Risk Assessment.” In Preventive Conservation: Collection Storage, edited by Lisa Elkin and Christopher A. Norris, 59–90. Society for the Preservation of Natural History; American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works; Smithsonian Institution; The George Washington University Museum Studies Program.

Will, Thomas and Hans-Rudolf Meier. 2007. “Cultural Heritage and Natural Disasters: Risk Preparedness and the Limits of Prevention.” In Cultural Heritage and Natural Disasters Risk Preparedness and the Limits of Prevention, edited by Birgit Finger, Hans-Rudolf Meier and Thomas Will, 9–20. Leipzig: ICOMOS-International Council on Monuments and Sites.

Preuzimanja

Objavljeno

26.08.2022.