Strategic decision-making, marketing investments, and game theory: Optimal competitive strategies between Coca-Cola and Pepsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/oec.4734Keywords:
strategic decision-making, game theory, prisoner's dilemma, marketing investments, Coca-Cola, PepsiAbstract
The market rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi throughout history represents a paradigmatic example of dynamic and long-standing competition within the soft drink industry. Although both companies offer similar products and target the same market segments, their business models and strategies differ significantly. Over the years, PepsiCo has benefited from early diversification, expanding its portfolio to include non-carbonated beverages and snack products, while Coca-Cola has remained strongly focused on the carbonated beverage segment, relying on global brand recognition and a traditional marketing approach. Despite their differing strategies, both companies continuously adapt their business models to respond to changing consumer preferences, making them a fascinating example of long-term corporate rivalry. This research is motivated by the need for a deeper understanding of the complex aspects of competitive dynamics between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, particularly in the context of marketing investments and their role in ensuring market dominance. Despite extensive literature on market competition, the scientific research environment has not yet fully utilized the theoretical frameworks of game theory to analyze the strategic decisions of these companies. Therefore, the aim of this study is to model the market interaction between Coca-Cola and Pepsi through the Prisoner's Dilemma game, applying three key strategies: maintaining equal investment, reducing investment, and increasing investment in marketing activities. The analysis is based on empirical data on marketing investment costs for the period 2014–2023, enabling a quantitative modeling of competitive decisions. Additionally, the study explores the possibility of extending the model through the application of mixed strategies, allowing for a more realistic simulation of uncertainty and changing market conditions. The findings of this research can serve as a foundation for making optimal investment strategies, where corporate decisions will not only impact their individual profitability but also shape the overall market dynamics of the soft drink industry. Expanding the model to include multiple players, including other major competitors in the soft drink industry, could further enhance the understanding of market competition.
References
Anukeerthi, S., Baranidharan, S. (2024) Comparative Analysis of Advertisment Strategies used by Coca-Cola and Pepsi: A Literature Review Study. International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11 (3), str. 217 – 2024.
Brick, D. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., Fitzsimons, G. J. (2018) Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (5), str. 991 – 1014.
Church, J. R., Ware, R. (2000) Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach, Irwin McGraw Hill.
Dai, Y. (2021) Comparison of Emphasis Point Towards Marketing Strategies Between Pepsi & Coca-Cola. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICIFIED 2021), Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 166, str. 79 – 83.
Dhar, T. P., Chavas, J-P., Cotterill, R. W., Gould, B. W. (2005) An Econometric Analysis of Brand Level Strategic Pricing Between Coca-Cola and Pepsi Inc. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14 (4), str. 905 – 931.
Dixit, A., Nalebuff, B. (1991) Thinking Strategically, New York: Norton.
Forbes (2024) Picks Pepsi Stock Over Coca-Cola? Trefis Team. Dostupno na: https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2024/09/04/pick-pepsi-stock-over-coca-cola/.
Kayabaş, T. D., Boyraz, G., Derdiyok, R. (2017) Examining Coca-Cola and Pepsi Brands under the Basis of Globalisation and Multinational Companies. Internationa Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7 (12), str. 351 – 358.
Kristek, I. and Tomić, D. (2019) How to estimate technical efficiency? Interdisciplinary Management Research XV, Opatija, Croatia, May 16 - 18, 2019, str. 1188 – 1201.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., Green, J. R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nair, A., Selover, D. D. (2012) A study of competitive dynamics. Journal of Business Research, 65 (3), str. 355 – 361.
Nash, J. (1950) Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games, Proceedings of the NASC., 36: str. 48 - 49.
Qian, Y. (2023) Battle for the Lead: Analysis of Coca-Cola and Pepsi from Financial Performance. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 50, 29 – 35.
Sharma, S., Tomić, D. (2011) Mikroekonomska analiza tržišne moći i strateškog ponašanja poduzeća. Sveučilište Jurja Dobrila u Puli i Mikrorad d.o.o.
Schelling, T. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Statista (2025) Statista database. Dostupno na: https://www.statista.com/.
Srinithi, M., Sneha, D. V., Cruz, J. I. (2023) Strategic War Between Coca-Cola and Pepsi. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 5 (6), str. 1 – 4.
Štofová, L., Kopčáková, J. (2020) The Competition Strategy between Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi Company. Journal of Management Systems, 21 (179), str. 40 – 46.


