Artificial Intelligence and Green Transformation: Human Capital Upgrading, Green Finance, and ESG Assessment as Drivers of Sustainable Productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/oec.5026Keywords:
artificial intelligence, green finance, ESG performance, sustainable productivity, panel data analysis, mediation analysis, Chinese listed firmsAbstract
This study investigates the interrelationship between the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), green finance, and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance in relation to sustainable productivity within Chinese publicly listed companies. Utilizing comprehensive firm-level panel data that encompasses 1,000 listed firms from 2012 to 2024, amounting to 13,000 firm-year observations sourced from the CSMAR database, corporate disclosures, and reputable ESG rating agencies, the study applies pooled OLS and fixed-effects models, a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework, and mediation analyses to fill existing gaps in the comprehension of sustainable transformation mechanisms. The findings reveal a positive correlation between AI adoption and sustainable productivity (β = 0.115, p < 0.01), as well as with the intensity of green finance (β = 11.16, p < 0.05 in fixed effects). However, the ESG effects seem to indicate cross-sectional selection rather than improvements within firms. Mediation analysis indicates that green finance and ESG collectively account for approximately 18% of AI’s overall association (5.9% and 12.0%, respectively), with the remaining 82% functioning through direct operational channels. The 2012 Green Credit Guidelines are associated with a relative decrease in measured productivity among polluting industries (DiD: −16.48, p < 0.01), aligning with the policy’s restrictions on ‘Two-High’ sectors. Heterogeneity analysis shows that small firms benefit disproportionately from AI adoption (β = 0.131 compared to β = 0.112 for larger firms), challenging traditional beliefs regarding the technology-adoption benefits of large organizations. Key limitations include potential endogeneity, dependence on text-based and rating-based proxies, and the focus on a single-country context and this is why the future studies should consider employing instrumental-variable approaches, alternative metrics, and cross-country analyses. This study enhances the understanding of sustainable transformation as a synergistic process that integrates technological, financial, and governance aspects.
References
References
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716
Balcerzak, A. P., Škapa, S., & Zinecker, M. (2025). Start-ups and artificial intelligence: From application to value, and the five problems that shape effective implementation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1369–1376. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.4057
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161016
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 23-57). University of Chicago Press.
Dehghanpouri, H., Rostamzadeh, R., Sarlab, R., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2025). A new model to identify factors affecting sustainable performance of sports business. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1525–1564. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3407
Durana, P., Popescu, G. H., Kliestik, T., & Nica, E. (2025). Fintech meets the physicalworld:Leveraging IoT data streams for dynamic risk modelling and financial innovation . OeconomiaCopernicana, 16(4), 1377–1393. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.4058
Fabijańska, A., Wołczek, P., & Sikacz, H. (2025). Can machine learning bring ESG ratings closer to small and medium-sized enterprises? Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1615–1663. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3162
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Guo, L., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Green finance and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 43213-43228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25321-w
Hu, G., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 98, 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
Hu, Z., Zhang, J., & Chang, C.-P. (2025). AI and green credit: A new catalyst for green innovation in Chinese enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1447–1489. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3020
IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.
Lăzăroiu, G., Gedeon, T., Fernando, X., Herciu, M., Grecu, G., Chiru, C., & Nădăban, C. (2025). The algorithmic management of job loss and creation in the enterprise generative, multimodal, and agentic artificial intelligence economy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1491–1524. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3994
Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Yoshino, N. (2019). The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment. Finance Research Letters, 31, 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.016
Teng, Y.-M., & Wu, K.-S. (2025). Integrating green transformational leadership, green HRM, and green innovation to enhance sustainable performance in hotels. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1565–1614. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3797
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
Wang, H., Li, Y., Lin, W., & Wei, W. (2024). Digital transformation, green technology innovation and enterprise ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103085.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103085
Yavuz, H. B., Aytun, C., & Cengiz, O. (2025). Energy efficiency, human development, and renewables as drivers of the load capacity factor. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1725–1767.
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3880
Yu, G., & Qi, Y. (2025). Does AI application make enterprises productivity greener? Evidence from China. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3215
Zhang, D., Cao, H., & Zou, P. (2021). Exuberance in China's renewable energy investment: Rationality, capital structure and implications with firm level evidence. Energy Policy, 95, 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.024


