The influence of the situational and cognitive factors on the response style on personality questionnaires in the real-life selection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/radovifpsp.2434Abstract
The aim of this study was to find out if there were any interactive effect between the situational factors (four levels of competitiveness) and the subjects’ Intelligence on the style of responding on personality questionnaires (EPQ and ANSIE). The four levels of competitiveness were manipulated in the real-life faculty entrance exam situation. The results indicated that the manipulation caused different average results in different situations on all the scales except the E scale, but also that there were no interactions between situational and cognitive factors that could have influenced the response style. The only significant and interpretable difference between high and low groups according to inteligence was registered on the L scale in the extremely competitive situation, indicating that more intelligent subjects tended to make their results lower, when compared to less intelligent subjects. Such a response set might »mask« the eventual distortion of their results on other questionnaire scales. These results contribute to the criticism of the construct of generalized distortion of responses, which is based on the L scale results.
References
Edwards, A. L. (1970): The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Elliot, A. G. P. (1981): Some implications of lie scores in real-life selection. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 9—16.
Gordon, M. E. & Gross, R. H. (1978): A critique of methods of operationalizing the concept of fakeability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 771—782.
Heilbrun, A. B. (1964): Social learning theory, social desirability, and the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 377—378.
Heilbrun, A. B. (1965): The social desirability variable: Implications for test reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 745—756.
Jones, E. E. & Sigall, H. (1971): The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349—364.
Linehan, M. M. & Nielsen, S. L. (1983): Social desirability: Its relevance to the measurement of hopelessness and suicidal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 141—143.
Newid, J. S. (1983): Hopelessness, social desirability, and construct validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 139—140.
Nowicki, S. & Duke, M. P. (1974): A locus of control scale for noncollege as well as college adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 136—137.
Oakland, J. A. (1974): Adequacy of socalisatlon as an interpretation of the social desirability response set. Psychological Reports, 35, 887—892. Power, R. P, & Mac Rae, K. D, (1971): Detectability of items in the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Psychology, 62, 395—401
Sipka, P. (1984): Distorzija rezultata na Junior EPQ, disimulacija i motivacija za disimulaciju: O jednoj novoj funkciji skala leži. Konstrukcija psihologijskih mjernih instrumenata. Tematska sekcija — VII Kongres psihologa SFRJ.
Velicer, W. F. & Weiner, B. J. (1975): Effeects of sophistication and faking sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 37, 71—73.
Wylie, R. C. (1974): The self-concept, Volume 1. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.