Comparison of three age groups in different aspects of satisfaction with life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/radovifpsp.2645Keywords:
satisfaction with life, positive affects, negative affects, age, life transitionsAbstract
Satisfaction with life is an often used term, and after the sixties many researchers have published many scientific works and papers on this theme. The available literature deals with measurement and defines satisfaction with life in the larger context of subjective well-being. This concept includes: 1. satisfaction with life, as a cognitive component, 2. positive, and 3. negative affects, as affective components. There are also some disagreements about the effects of age on satisfaction with life.
The investigation covered 228 subjects. Heedful of Levinson's theoretical insight about life transitions, the subjects were sorted into three groups: a group of students, a group of middle aged people, and a group of older people. The aspects of satisfaction with life were measured on the scales originally used for assessment of subjective well being. The results of comparing these three groups of subjects show that the group of students and the group of older people differ from the third group only in the number of subjectively expressed somatic complaints. Students and older people have more somatic complaints titan the group of middle aged people. In the other aspects of subjective well-being there are no differences among the three age groups. Generally speaking, results indicate that títere are no differences among the three age groups in regard to the main aspects of subjective well-being and that the scales used are reliable for further use on a sample of Croatian subjects.
References
BADOUX, A. & MENDELSOHN, G. A. (1995): Subjective well-being in French and American samples: Scale development and comparative data, Quality of Life Research, 3, 395-401.
BEZINOVIĆ, P. (1988): Percepcija osobne kompetentnosti kao dimenzija samopoimanja, Doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet u Zagrebu.
CLARKE-STEWART, A., PERLMUTTER, M. & FRIEDMAN, S. (1988): Lifelong Human Development, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 479- 506.
DIENER, E. (1984): Subjective well-being, Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542- 575.
DIENER, E. (1994): Assessing Subjective Well-being: Progress and Opportunities, Social Indicators Research, 31, 103-157.
DIENER, E. (1996): Traits Can be Powerful, But Are Not Enough: Lessons from Subjective Well-Being, Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 389-399.
GIGY, L.L. (1985-86): Preretired and Retired Women's Attitudes Toward Retirement, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 22, 1,31-44.
GROB, A. (1995): Subjective Well-Being and Significant Life Events Across Life Span, Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 1, 3-18.
HORLEY, J., LA VERY, J.J. (1995): Subjective Well-being and Age, Social Indicators Research, 34, 275-282.
KIMMEL, D.C. (1990): Adulthood and Aging, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
LACKOVIĆ-GRGIN, K. (1994): Samopoimanje mladih, Jastrebareko, Naklada "Slap".
LUCAS, R.E., DIENER, E. & SUH, E. (1996): Discriminant Validity of Well- Being^ Measures, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 3, 616-62S.
MCCRAE, R.R & COSTA, P.T. Jr. (1982): Self Concept and the Stability of Personality: Cross-Sectional Comparisons of Self reports and Ratings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 6,1282-1292.
MCCRAE, R.R & COSTA, P.T. Jr. (1982a): Aging, the life course and models of personality, U: Field, M. i sur. (Ur.). Review of Human development, New York, Wiley, 601-613.
PENEZIĆ, Z. (1996): Zadovoljstvo životom-provjera konstrukta, Diplomski rad, Filozofski fakultet u Zadru.