Narrowing the Private Sphere in Dystopian Novels of George Orwell,Josip Mlakić and Juli Zeh
sužavanje privatnog udistopijskim romanima Georgea Orwella, Josipa Mlakića i Juli Zeh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/csi.4445Keywords:
dystopia, ideology, literature, law, private sphereAbstract
From the law and literature perspective, two researchers, one from the field of law, other from literature theory, try to analyse literary treatment of the private law issue. In other words, we deal with evident narrowing of the private sphere from different entities, as it is presented in the chosen novels: George Orwell’s 1984, Josip Mlakić’s The Friedman Planet, and Juli Zeh’s Corpus Delicti. It is important that novels belong to different times and spaces so the results of the analysis can be used for tracking the focus and its shifting on certain entities that threaten the private sphere. Besides that, we can also notice similar shifting in the political, legal, social, and cultural context during the same period, reaffirming the thesis about dystopia’s narrative tactic: camouflaging contemporary problems as problems of future times. For these reasons, the problem or goal of the research is derived from the potential comparison of changes in the focus of narrative strategies in the three novels and the social changes that have marked the context of these narratives. The research question imposed a methodological approach that involves knowledge from the fields of law and literature, as well as sociology of literature and discourse analysis. Consequently, the study resulted in the recognition of a high degree of similarity or connection between literary (dystopian) and extraliterary treatments of issues in private law.
Downloads
References
Primarna literatura
Mlakić, Josip. 2012. Planet Friedman. Zagreb: Fraktura.
Orwell, George. 2015. 1984. Prev. Antun Šoljan. Zagreb: Šareni dućan.
Zeh, Juli. 2011. Corpus delicti. Prev. Latica Bilopavlović Vuković. Zagreb: Fraktura.
Sekundarna literatura
Asimow, Michale i Shannon S. Mader. 2013. Law and Popular Culture. New York: Peter Lang.
Alexander, D. Victoria. 2007. Sociologija umetnosti (istraživanja lepih i popularnih formi). Prev. Jelena Kosovac. Beograd: Clio.
Bačić, Arsen. 2015. „Pokret Pravo i literatura i cilj narativne jurisprudencije”, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu. god. 52, 2/2015: 311–333.
Barker, Chris. 2008. Cultural Studies - Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Baro, Jane B. 1999. „Law, Literature, and the Problems of Interdisciplinarity”. The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108, No. 5: 1059–1085.
Bonython, Wendy i Buce Arnold Baer. 2015. „Privacy, Personhood, and Property in the Age of Genomics”. Laws 2015/ 4: 377–412.
Božić, Rafaela. 2013. Distopija i jezik (distopijski roman kroz oko lingvistike). Zadar: Sveučilište u Zadru.
Chin, Josh i Liza Lin. 2022. Surveillance State: Inside China’s Quest to Launch a New Era of Social Control. St. Martin’s Press
Gavella, Nikola. 2000. Osobna prava. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Gavella, Nikola. 2019. Privatno pravo. Zagreb: Narodne novine.
Harbinja, Edina. 2022. Digital Death, Digital Assets and Post-mortem Privacy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hatuka, Tali i Eran Toch. 2016. „The emergence of portable private-personal territory”. Urban Studies, Vol. 53, No.10: 2192–2208.
Hobbes, Thomas. 2013. Levijatan. Prev. Borislav Mikulić. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Jameson, Frederic. 2005. Archaeologies of the future. London and New York: Verso. Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda, NN, MU, 18/97, 6/99, 14/02, 13/03, 9/05, 1/06, 2/10, 13/17.
Landripet, Ivan. 2004. „Orwellova 1984. – Aktualnost distopijskog predloška i implikacije novootkrivenog djela”. Diskrepancija, Sv. 5, Br. 9: 41–54.
Lynskey, Dorian. 2020. Ministarstvo istine (biografija romana 1984. Georga Orwella). Prev. Nika Perić. Zagreb: Fokus.
Malenica, Irena i Zdenka Matek Šmit. 2018. „Distopijsko tematiziranje budućnosti: od Zamjatina do Mlakića i Popovića”. Tabula: časopis Filozofskog fakulteta, Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli, No. 15: 332–348.
Minda, Gary. 1997. „Law and Literature at Century’s End”. Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, Vol. 9, No. 2: 45–258.
Mumford, Lewis. 2008. Povijest utopija. Prev. Paulina Tomić. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Presuda Vrhovnog suda Republike Hrvatske, Rev 628/2015-2, od 6. ožujka 2018.
Romac, Ante. 1973. Izvori rimskog prava. Zagreb: Informator.
Sabo, Dorian i Josip Berdica. 2021. „Law and Film An Essay on Legal Culture”. In medias res: časopis filozofije medija, Vol. 10, No. 19: 3205–3218
Sussman, Henry. 1989. „A Note on the Public and the Private in Literature: The Literature of Acting Out”. MLN, Vol. 104, No. 3: 597–611.
Suvin, Darko. 2010. Metamorfoze znanstvene fantastike. Zagreb: Profil.
Travis, Mitchell. 2011. „Making Space: Law and Science Fiction”. Law and Literature, Vol. 23, No. 2: 241–261.
Van Dijk, Niels. 2010. „Property, privacy and personhood in a world of ambient Intelligence”. Ethics and Information Technology 2010/12: 57–69.
Vrban, Duško. 2003. Država i pravo. Zagreb: Golden marketing.
Vuković, Vuk. 2019. „Filozofija (medijske) distopije: društveni život između Sluškinjine priče i Crnog ogledala”. In medias res: časopis filozofije medija Vol. 8, Br. 14: 2219–2229.
Zakon o obveznim odnosima, NN, 35/05, 41/08, 125/11, 78/15, 29/18, 126/21, 114/22, 156/22.
Internetski članci:
Bullard, Alfredo G. 2016. „Law and Technology: From Socialist Dystopia to Capitalist Utopia”. URL: https://www.academia.edu/33577607/Legal_Theory_and_Science_Fiction_Law_in_the_Eyes_of_Sci_Fi_i (15. siječnja 2023.)
Posner, Richard A. 1986. „Law and Literature: A Relation Reargued”. URL: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2882&context=journal_articles (18. siječnja 2023.)


