Očemnost (o-čemu-govori-dokument): prvi korak predmetnog označivanja i njegova upotreba u svakodnevnom životu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.3911Ključne riječi:
očemnost, predmetno označivanje, sadržajna analiza, tema dokumentaSažetak
Cilj. Rad obrađuje problematiku očemnosti kao središnjeg pojma u području sadržajne organizacije znanja i informacija i kao prvog koraka u postupku označivanja predmeta ili teme dokumenta. Očemnost (o čemu, engl. about -ness) se odnosi na određivanje onoga o čemu dokument govori, što dokument pokriva, odnosno što mu je predmet ili tema. Cilj je rada ponuditi definiciju, tipologiju i razumijevanje koncepta očemnosti, kao i opis postojećih postupaka i metoda njegova određivanja.
Pristup i metodologija. U ovom je radu korištena metoda detaljnog pregleda i analize literature iz područja predmetnog označivanja. Dodatno, kod preglednih radova na temu očemnosti korištena je i metoda praćenja citiranih radova (engl. footnote chasing), kao i radova koji su citirali promatrani pregledni rad (engl. citation searching).
Rezultati. Kao rezultat pregleda literature utvrđeno je nekoliko praktičnih metoda za određivanje očemnosti koje su dali autori Joudrey, Wilson, Langridge i Taylor te nekoliko različitih pristupa i problema koji se mogu pojaviti tijekom tog postupka.
Originalnost/vrijednost. Krajnji je cilj dobivene spoznaje i rezultate oprimjeriti kroz njihovu praktičnu primjenu u svakodnevnom životu. Upravo oprimjerenost teorijskih spoznaja o očemnosti doprinosi njezinu boljem razumijevanju i određivanju i kod informacijskih stručnjaka, stručnjaka za optimizaciju tražilica, novinara i urednika mrežnih stranica, i kod krajnjih korisnika koji pretražuju internet i dodjeljuju svoje oznake (tagove), u čemu se ogleda i originalnost ovoga rada.
Preuzimanja
Reference
Albrechsten, Hanne. 1993. „Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis.“ The Indexer 18, no. 4: 219‒24. https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1993.18.4.3.
Anić, Vladimir. 1998. Rječnik hrvatskog jezika. 3. prošireno izd. Zagreb: Novi Liber.
Banek-Zorica, Mihaela, Sonja Špiranec i Krešimir Zauder. 2007. „Collaborative tagging: providing user created organizational structure for Web 2.0.“ U Zbornik radova 1. Međunarodne znanstvene konferencije „The Future of Information Sciences: INFuture2007 – Digital Information and Heritage“, uredili Sanja Seljan i Hrvoje Stančić, 193‒202. Zagreb: Odsjek za informacijske znanosti, Filozofski fakultet.
Beghtol, Clare. 1986. „Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality, and the cognitive act of classifying documents.“ Journal of Documentation 42, no. 2: 84‒113. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026788.
Boyce, Bert. 1982. „Beyond topicality: A two-stage view of relevance and the retrieval process.“ Information Processing and Management 18, no. 3: 105‒09. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(82)90033-4.
Brown, Alan G. 1982. An introduction to subject indexing. London: Clive Bingley.
Chi, Ed H., Peter Pirolli, Kim Chen i James Pitkow. 2001. „Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web“ U Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, uredili Julie Jacko and Andrew Sears, 490‒497. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Chu, Clara M. i Ann O'Brien. 1993. „Subject analysis: the first critical stages in indexing.“ Journal of Information Science 19, no. 6: 439‒54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900603.
Chu, Heting. 2007. Information representation and retrieval in the digital age. Medford, NJ: Published for the American Society for Information Science and Tehnology by Information Today. http://books.google.hr/books?id=Rzg6WagUrawC&printsec=frontcover&hl=hr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Fairthorne, Robert A. 1969. „Content analysis, specification, and control.“ Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 4: 73‒109.
Golub, Koraljka. 2021. „Automated subject indexing: an overview.“ Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59, no. 8: 702‒19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.2012311.
Grut, Ståle. 2017. „With a quiz to comment, readers test their article comprehension.“ NRKbeta.no. Last accessed September 3, 2022. https://nrkbeta.no/2017/08/10/with-a-quiz-to-comment-readers-test-their-article-comprehension/.
Hawke, Peter. 2018. „Theories of aboutness.“ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96, no. 4: 697‒723. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1388826.
Hjørland, Birger. 1992. „The concept of ‘subject’ in information science.“ Journal of Documentation 48, no. 2:172‒200. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026895.
Holley, Ralph M. i Daniel N. Joudrey. 2020. „Aboutness and conceptual analysis: a review." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59, no. 2/3: 159‒85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1856992.
Hutchins, William John. 1977. „On the problem of aboutness in document analysis.“ Journal of Informatics 1, no. 1:17‒35. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ON-THE-PROBLEM-OF-%27ABOUTNESS%27-IN-DOCUMENT-ANALYSIS-Hutchins/e9b928aa2aacfefe2a1eddd864dc34cabdbd1dc7.
Hutchins, William John. 1978. „The concept of ‘aboutness’ in subject indexing.“ Aslib Proceedings 30, no. 5: 172‒81. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb050629.
IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2010. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): a conceptual model. München: KG Saur.
Ingwersen, Peter. 2002. „Cognitive perspectives of document representation.“ U Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), uredili Harry Bruce, Raya Fidel, Peter Ingwersen i Pertti Vakkari, 289‒91. Greenwood Village, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
ISO (International Standards Organization). 2017. ISO 5127:2017 Information and documentation — Foundation and vocabulary. Geneve: ISO. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5127:ed-2:v1:en.
ISO (International Standards Organization).1985. ISO 5963:1985 Documentation- Methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting indexing terms. Geneve: ISO.
Ivanjko, Tomislav. 2017. „Korisničko označivanje i predmetni pristup.“ U Predmetna obrada: pogled unaprijed: zbornik radova, uredili Branka Purgarić-Kužić i Sonja Špiranec, 38‒56. Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Jones, Kevin P. 1983. „How do we index? A report of some ASLIB informatics group activities.“ Journal of Documentation 39, no. 1: 1‒23. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026736.
Joudrey, Daniel N. 2005. Building puzzles and growing pearls: a qualitative exploration of determining aboutnes: doctoral thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/10357/1/JoudreyDanielN_DissertEdt2005.pdf.
Kintsch, Walter i Teun A. Van Dijk. 1978. „Toward a model of text comprehension and production.“ Psihological Review 85, no. 5: 363‒94.
Lancaster, Frederick W. 1998. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Compaing Illions: University of Illinois.
Landau, Idan. 2011. „Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising.“ Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 779–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9134-4.
Langridge, Derek W. 1989. Subject analysis: principles and procedures. London: Browker-Saur.
Lasić-Lazić, Jadranka. 1998. „Sadržajna obrada danas i pravci razvoja.“ U Predmetna obradba – ishodišta i smjernice: zbornik radova, uredile Jadranka Lasić-Lazić, Jelica Leščić i Jasna Petrić, 23‒32. Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 1999. „A postmodern theory of knowledge organization.“ U Knowledge: Creation, Organization and Use: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, uredio Larry Woods, Volume 36: 547‒56. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/1999_APostmodernTheoryOfKnowledgeOrganization.pdf.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2000. The subject indexing process: an investigation of problems in knowledge representation: unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/2000_PhDdiss.pdf.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2001. „Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process.“ Journal of Documentation 57, no. 5: 591–622. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/2001_Semiotics.pdf.
Maron, M. E. 1977. „On indexing, retrieval, and the meaning of about.“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28, no. 1, 38‒43. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630280107.
Mathes, Adam. 2004. „Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata.“ U Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC (Doctoral Seminar), Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1‒13. http://adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.pdf.
Merriam-Webster online dictonary. 2022. s. v. „Subject.“ Merriam-Webster. Pristupljeno: 14. rujna 2022. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subject.
Mikačić, Mira. 1996. Teorijske osnove sustava za predmetno označivanje. Zagreb: Hrvatsko bibliotekarsko društvo.
Milstead, Jessica L. 1994 . „Needs for Research in Indexing.“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45, no. 8: 577‒82. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199409)45:8<577::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-P.
Panofsky, Erwin. 1955. Meaning in the visual arts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pugarić Kužić, Branka. 2011. „Društveno označivanje i knjižnice.“ Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 54, no. 4: 189‒210. http://hrcak.srce.hr/80048.
Rogers, Anna, Olga Kovaleva i Anna Rumshisky. 2020. „A primer in BERTology: what we know about how BERT works.“ Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 8:842–866. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00349.
Rondeau, Wendy Gail. 2012. The lifeworld in the library's backroom: a hermeneutic phenomenological study of the cataloguer's lived experience of aboutness determination: doctoral thesis. Milwaukee: The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. http://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=etd.
Rowley, Jennifer i John Farrow. 2007. 3rd ed. Organizing knowledge: an introduction to managing access to information, Aldershot : Ashgate.
Shatford, Sara. 1986. „Analyzing the subject of a picture: a theoretical approach.“ Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 6, no. 3: 39‒62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v06n03_04.
Slavić, Aida. 1998. „Automatsko predmetno označivanje: od računalno potpomognutog predmetnog označivanja do znalačkih sustava.“ U Predmetna obradba: ishodišta i smjernice: zbornik radova, uredile Jadranka Lasić-Lazić et al., 98‒115. Zagreb: Hrvatsko bibliotekarsko društvo.
Soergel, Dagobert. 1985. Organizing information: principle of data base and retrieval systems. San Diego: Academic Press. https://books.google.hr/books?id=kG0xHT8XIUMC&printsec=frontcover&hl=hr#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Spiteri, Louise F. 2007. „The structure and form of folksonomy tags: the road to the public library catalog.“ Information Technology and Libraries 26, no. 3: 13‒25. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v26i3.3272.
Svenonius, Elaine. 2005. Intelektualne osnove organizacije informacija. Lokve: Benja.
Šauperl, Alenka. 2002. Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Špiranec, Sonja i Tomislav, Ivanjko. 2012. „Predmetni jezici s korisničkim jamstvom: što možemo naučiti od folksonomija?.“ U 15. seminar Arhivi, knjižnice, muzeji: mogućnosti suradnje u okruženju globalne informacijske infrastrukture: zbornik radova, uredili Damir Hasenay i Maja Krtalić, 57‒73. Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Špiranec, Sonja. 2014. „Subjektivna paradigma sadržajnog označivanja.“ Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 57, no. 1‒3: 1‒14. https://hrcak.srce.hr/142161.
Štrbac, Dušanka i Mirjana Vujić. 2004. Pravilnik za predmetni katalog. Zagreb: Knjižnice grada Zagreba.
Taylor, Arlene G. i Daniel N. Joudrey. 2009. 3. izd. The organization of information. London: Libraries Unlimited.
Thomas, Marliese, Dana M. Caudle i Cecilia M. Schmitz. 2009. „To tag or not to tag?“ Library Hi Tech 27, no. 3: 411‒434. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830910988540.
Thurow, Shari. 2015. „To optimize search, optimize the searcher: a commentary.“ Online Searcher 39: 44‒48.
Todd, Ross. 1992. „Academic Indexing: what's it all about?.“ The Indexer 18, no. 2: 101‒04. https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1992.18.2.10.
Todd, Ross. 1993. „Subject access ‒ what's it all about? Some research findings.“ Cataloguing Australia 19, no. 3‒4: 259‒267.
Weinberg, Bella Hass. 1988. „Why indexing fails the researcher.“ The Indexer 16, no. 1: 3‒6.
Wellisch, Hans H. 1994. „Book and periodical indexing.“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45: 620‒627. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199409)45:8<620::AID-ASI17>3.0.CO;2-V.
Wilson, Patrick. 1968. Two kinds od power: an essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wilson, Patrick. 1985. „Subjects and the sense of position.“ U Theory of Subject Analysis: A Source-book, uredili Lois Mai Chan, Phyllis A. Richmond i Elaine Svenonius, 309‒320. Littleton, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
Preuzimanja
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Autorska prava (c) 2022 Kristina Feldvari
This work is licensed under a KreativniCommons Attribution-NonCommercial Međunarodne licence.
