Aboutness (what-the-document-is-about): the first step of subject indexing and its use in everyday life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.3911Keywords:
aboutness , document topic, subject analysis, subject indexingAbstract
Purpose. The paper discusses the topic of aboutness as a central concept in the field of subject matter organization of knowledge and information and as the first step in the subject indexing process. Aboutness refers to determining what the document is about, what the document covers, or what its subject or topic is. The primary goal of the paper is to offer a definition, typology and understanding of the concept of aboutness, as well as a description of the existing procedures and methods of its determination, based on a detailed review of recent literature.
Approach/methodology. The paper uses the method of detailed literature review and analysis in the field of subject indexing, as well as the methods of footnote chasing and citation searching in case of the review papers on the topic of aboutness.
Findings. The review results showed there are several practical methods for determining the aboutness by Joudrey, Wilson, Langridge and Taylor, and several problems that may arise during this procedure.
Originality/value. The ultimate aim is to exemplify the acquired knowledge and the results through their practical application in everyday life. It is precisely the exemplification of theoretical knowledge on aboutness that shows the originality of the present paper and at the same time contributes to its better understanding and determining both by information science and search engine optimization experts, journalists and website editors, as well as by the end users who search the Internet and assign their tags.
Downloads
References
Albrechsten, Hanne. 1993. „Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis.“ The Indexer 18, no. 4: 219‒24. https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1993.18.4.3.
Anić, Vladimir. 1998. Rječnik hrvatskog jezika. 3. prošireno izd. Zagreb: Novi Liber.
Banek-Zorica, Mihaela, Sonja Špiranec i Krešimir Zauder. 2007. „Collaborative tagging: providing user created organizational structure for Web 2.0.“ U Zbornik radova 1. Međunarodne znanstvene konferencije „The Future of Information Sciences: INFuture2007 – Digital Information and Heritage“, uredili Sanja Seljan i Hrvoje Stančić, 193‒202. Zagreb: Odsjek za informacijske znanosti, Filozofski fakultet.
Beghtol, Clare. 1986. „Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality, and the cognitive act of classifying documents.“ Journal of Documentation 42, no. 2: 84‒113. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026788.
Boyce, Bert. 1982. „Beyond topicality: A two-stage view of relevance and the retrieval process.“ Information Processing and Management 18, no. 3: 105‒09. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(82)90033-4.
Brown, Alan G. 1982. An introduction to subject indexing. London: Clive Bingley.
Chi, Ed H., Peter Pirolli, Kim Chen i James Pitkow. 2001. „Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web“ U Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, uredili Julie Jacko and Andrew Sears, 490‒497. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Chu, Clara M. i Ann O'Brien. 1993. „Subject analysis: the first critical stages in indexing.“ Journal of Information Science 19, no. 6: 439‒54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900603.
Chu, Heting. 2007. Information representation and retrieval in the digital age. Medford, NJ: Published for the American Society for Information Science and Tehnology by Information Today. http://books.google.hr/books?id=Rzg6WagUrawC&printsec=frontcover&hl=hr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Fairthorne, Robert A. 1969. „Content analysis, specification, and control.“ Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 4: 73‒109.
Golub, Koraljka. 2021. „Automated subject indexing: an overview.“ Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59, no. 8: 702‒19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.2012311.
Grut, Ståle. 2017. „With a quiz to comment, readers test their article comprehension.“ NRKbeta.no. Last accessed September 3, 2022. https://nrkbeta.no/2017/08/10/with-a-quiz-to-comment-readers-test-their-article-comprehension/.
Hawke, Peter. 2018. „Theories of aboutness.“ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96, no. 4: 697‒723. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1388826.
Hjørland, Birger. 1992. „The concept of ‘subject’ in information science.“ Journal of Documentation 48, no. 2:172‒200. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026895.
Holley, Ralph M. i Daniel N. Joudrey. 2020. „Aboutness and conceptual analysis: a review." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59, no. 2/3: 159‒85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1856992.
Hutchins, William John. 1977. „On the problem of aboutness in document analysis.“ Journal of Informatics 1, no. 1:17‒35. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ON-THE-PROBLEM-OF-%27ABOUTNESS%27-IN-DOCUMENT-ANALYSIS-Hutchins/e9b928aa2aacfefe2a1eddd864dc34cabdbd1dc7.
Hutchins, William John. 1978. „The concept of ‘aboutness’ in subject indexing.“ Aslib Proceedings 30, no. 5: 172‒81. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb050629.
IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2010. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): a conceptual model. München: KG Saur.
Ingwersen, Peter. 2002. „Cognitive perspectives of document representation.“ U Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), uredili Harry Bruce, Raya Fidel, Peter Ingwersen i Pertti Vakkari, 289‒91. Greenwood Village, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
ISO (International Standards Organization). 2017. ISO 5127:2017 Information and documentation — Foundation and vocabulary. Geneve: ISO. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5127:ed-2:v1:en.
ISO (International Standards Organization).1985. ISO 5963:1985 Documentation- Methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting indexing terms. Geneve: ISO.
Ivanjko, Tomislav. 2017. „Korisničko označivanje i predmetni pristup.“ U Predmetna obrada: pogled unaprijed: zbornik radova, uredili Branka Purgarić-Kužić i Sonja Špiranec, 38‒56. Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Jones, Kevin P. 1983. „How do we index? A report of some ASLIB informatics group activities.“ Journal of Documentation 39, no. 1: 1‒23. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026736.
Joudrey, Daniel N. 2005. Building puzzles and growing pearls: a qualitative exploration of determining aboutnes: doctoral thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/10357/1/JoudreyDanielN_DissertEdt2005.pdf.
Kintsch, Walter i Teun A. Van Dijk. 1978. „Toward a model of text comprehension and production.“ Psihological Review 85, no. 5: 363‒94.
Lancaster, Frederick W. 1998. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Compaing Illions: University of Illinois.
Landau, Idan. 2011. „Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising.“ Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 779–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9134-4.
Langridge, Derek W. 1989. Subject analysis: principles and procedures. London: Browker-Saur.
Lasić-Lazić, Jadranka. 1998. „Sadržajna obrada danas i pravci razvoja.“ U Predmetna obradba – ishodišta i smjernice: zbornik radova, uredile Jadranka Lasić-Lazić, Jelica Leščić i Jasna Petrić, 23‒32. Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 1999. „A postmodern theory of knowledge organization.“ U Knowledge: Creation, Organization and Use: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, uredio Larry Woods, Volume 36: 547‒56. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/1999_APostmodernTheoryOfKnowledgeOrganization.pdf.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2000. The subject indexing process: an investigation of problems in knowledge representation: unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/2000_PhDdiss.pdf.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2001. „Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process.“ Journal of Documentation 57, no. 5: 591–622. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/2001_Semiotics.pdf.
Maron, M. E. 1977. „On indexing, retrieval, and the meaning of about.“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28, no. 1, 38‒43. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630280107.
Mathes, Adam. 2004. „Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata.“ U Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC (Doctoral Seminar), Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1‒13. http://adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.pdf.
Merriam-Webster online dictonary. 2022. s. v. „Subject.“ Merriam-Webster. Pristupljeno: 14. rujna 2022. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subject.
Mikačić, Mira. 1996. Teorijske osnove sustava za predmetno označivanje. Zagreb: Hrvatsko bibliotekarsko društvo.
Milstead, Jessica L. 1994 . „Needs for Research in Indexing.“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45, no. 8: 577‒82. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199409)45:8<577::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-P.
Panofsky, Erwin. 1955. Meaning in the visual arts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pugarić Kužić, Branka. 2011. „Društveno označivanje i knjižnice.“ Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 54, no. 4: 189‒210. http://hrcak.srce.hr/80048.
Rogers, Anna, Olga Kovaleva i Anna Rumshisky. 2020. „A primer in BERTology: what we know about how BERT works.“ Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 8:842–866. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00349.
Rondeau, Wendy Gail. 2012. The lifeworld in the library's backroom: a hermeneutic phenomenological study of the cataloguer's lived experience of aboutness determination: doctoral thesis. Milwaukee: The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. http://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=etd.
Rowley, Jennifer i John Farrow. 2007. 3rd ed. Organizing knowledge: an introduction to managing access to information, Aldershot : Ashgate.
Shatford, Sara. 1986. „Analyzing the subject of a picture: a theoretical approach.“ Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 6, no. 3: 39‒62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v06n03_04.
Slavić, Aida. 1998. „Automatsko predmetno označivanje: od računalno potpomognutog predmetnog označivanja do znalačkih sustava.“ U Predmetna obradba: ishodišta i smjernice: zbornik radova, uredile Jadranka Lasić-Lazić et al., 98‒115. Zagreb: Hrvatsko bibliotekarsko društvo.
Soergel, Dagobert. 1985. Organizing information: principle of data base and retrieval systems. San Diego: Academic Press. https://books.google.hr/books?id=kG0xHT8XIUMC&printsec=frontcover&hl=hr#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Spiteri, Louise F. 2007. „The structure and form of folksonomy tags: the road to the public library catalog.“ Information Technology and Libraries 26, no. 3: 13‒25. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v26i3.3272.
Svenonius, Elaine. 2005. Intelektualne osnove organizacije informacija. Lokve: Benja.
Šauperl, Alenka. 2002. Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Špiranec, Sonja i Tomislav, Ivanjko. 2012. „Predmetni jezici s korisničkim jamstvom: što možemo naučiti od folksonomija?.“ U 15. seminar Arhivi, knjižnice, muzeji: mogućnosti suradnje u okruženju globalne informacijske infrastrukture: zbornik radova, uredili Damir Hasenay i Maja Krtalić, 57‒73. Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Špiranec, Sonja. 2014. „Subjektivna paradigma sadržajnog označivanja.“ Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 57, no. 1‒3: 1‒14. https://hrcak.srce.hr/142161.
Štrbac, Dušanka i Mirjana Vujić. 2004. Pravilnik za predmetni katalog. Zagreb: Knjižnice grada Zagreba.
Taylor, Arlene G. i Daniel N. Joudrey. 2009. 3. izd. The organization of information. London: Libraries Unlimited.
Thomas, Marliese, Dana M. Caudle i Cecilia M. Schmitz. 2009. „To tag or not to tag?“ Library Hi Tech 27, no. 3: 411‒434. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830910988540.
Thurow, Shari. 2015. „To optimize search, optimize the searcher: a commentary.“ Online Searcher 39: 44‒48.
Todd, Ross. 1992. „Academic Indexing: what's it all about?.“ The Indexer 18, no. 2: 101‒04. https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1992.18.2.10.
Todd, Ross. 1993. „Subject access ‒ what's it all about? Some research findings.“ Cataloguing Australia 19, no. 3‒4: 259‒267.
Weinberg, Bella Hass. 1988. „Why indexing fails the researcher.“ The Indexer 16, no. 1: 3‒6.
Wellisch, Hans H. 1994. „Book and periodical indexing.“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45: 620‒627. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199409)45:8<620::AID-ASI17>3.0.CO;2-V.
Wilson, Patrick. 1968. Two kinds od power: an essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wilson, Patrick. 1985. „Subjects and the sense of position.“ U Theory of Subject Analysis: A Source-book, uredili Lois Mai Chan, Phyllis A. Richmond i Elaine Svenonius, 309‒320. Littleton, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kristina Feldvari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
