From students' self-evaluation to quality learning achievements

Authors

  • Luči Brusać University of Zadar, Department of Teachers and Preschool Teachers Education
  • Josipa Dadić University of Zadar, Department of Teachers and Preschool Teachers Education
  • Tamara Kisovar-Ivanda University of Zadar, Department of Teachers and Preschool Teachers Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15291/magistra.1328

Keywords:

students’ self-assessment, formative assessment, student achievement

Abstract

The paper presents a study conducted to draw attention to the possibilities of developing the skills of self-evaluation in the process of school learning and their relationship to student achievements. Strategy of here displayed self-evaluation is aimed at learning (development, formative purpose), and not according to numerical assessment (summative purposes). The study included 196 participants (188 students from two schools in Zadar and their 8 teacher). The experimental group included 98 ofstudents, while the control group included 90 ofstudents. With the aim of deep insight into the process of self-evaluation of students' achievements, during the study was used a combined methodology, which included the use of a questionnaire with seven questions of closed type and two open-ended questions intended for the free statements of students, taking part interview with students and semi-structured interviews with their teachers. The results of students' cognitive achievements of both groups, obtained by standardized tests of knowledge, were observedand and analyzed by methods of quantitative data processing. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the results of students experimental and control groups. Analysis of students' free narration and analysis of transcripts of interviews by teachers suggest, as has already been observed by quantitative analysis, trends of higher motivation of students, during and after continuous self-evaluation, reflection on cognitive and metakognitive level and about intensifying the teaching professional focus on the problems of student self-evaluation. Interpenetration of the conclusions of quantitative and qualitative analysis and interpretation is confirmed by the initial assumption that continuous formative self-evaluation of students, during school learning, positive impact on the level of students' achievements, and their interest in the topics.

References

ANDRADE, H., VALTCHEVA, A. 2009. Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. u: TheoryIntoPractice, 48. 12-19.

BEREITER, C., SCARDAMALIA, M. 1991. Higher Levels of Agency for ChildreninKnowledge Building: A Challenge for the Designof New Knowledge-Media. U:The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1). 37-68.

BROOKE,G., ANDRADE, H. 2013. Student Centered Assessment.

Preuzeto https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu/resources/teaching/evaluating-students/assessing-student-learning/student-self-assessment (pristupljeno 5.9.2016.)DENTASSESSMENT

GOH, P. S. C. i MATTHEWS, B. 2012. Concerns of student teachers: Identifying emerging themes through self-assessment. U Mok, M. (ur.) Self-directed learning oriented assessment in the Asia-Pacific . New York. Springer.

HENTIG, H. 2008. Što je obrazovanje: Esej. Zagreb. EDUCA

HOGAN, D., TOWNDROW, P.,KOH, K. 2009. The logic of confidence and the social economy of assessment reform in Singapore: A new institutionalist perspective. U E. Grigorenko (ur.). Assessment of abilities and competencies in the era of globalization. New York. Springer.

KOMENSKI, J.A. 1886. Informatorijum za školu materinsku. Zagreb. Nakladom hrvatskog pedagogijsko-književno gsabora.

KYRIACOU, C. 2001. Temeljna nastavna umijeća. Zagreb. EDUCA.

MATIJEVIĆ, M. 2002. Ocjenjivanje u osnovnoj školi. Zagreb. Profil.

Meyer, H. 2002. Didaktika razredne kvake: Rasprave o didaktici, metodici i razvoju škole. Zagreb. EDUCA.

MOK, M. M. C., GURR, D., IZAWA, E., KNIPPRATH, H., LEE, I. H., MEL,

M. A., PALMER, T., SHAN, W. J., i ZHANG, Y. 2003. Quality assurance

and school monitoring. Keeves, U i Watanabe, R. (ur..), International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region. Vol. 11. 945–958.

MOSS, C.,BROOKHART,S. 2009. Advancingformativeassessment on everyclassroom: a guide for instructionalleaders.Alexandria. USA. ASCD publications. Nacionalnom okvirnom kurikulumu. 2011. http://mzos.hr/datoteke/Nacionalni_okvirni_kurikulum.pdf (Preuzeto 5.9.2016.)

SERTIĆ, I., HALER,K. 2012. Načini praćenja postignuća učenika kroz Modularni kurikulum poslovanja vježbovne tvrtke. U: Tafra, V. (ur.) Učenje za poduzetništvo, Vol-2(1). 217-220.

TIHI, V. 1992. Zakon o osnovnom školstvu: Komentar-prilozi. Zagreb. Sveučilišna tiskara d.o.o.

Zakon o odgoju i obrazovanju u osnovnoj i srednjoj školi. 2014. http://www.zakon.hr/z/317/Zakon-o-odgoju-i-obrazovanju-u-osnovnoj-i-srednjoj-%C5%A1koli (pristupljeno 5.9.2016.)

Published

2017-11-08

Issue

Section

Preliminary communication