Competences of biology teachers in creating computer materials and using information and communications tecnhology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/magistra.1329Keywords:
ICT, biology teacher competencies, curricular approach to teaching, biology classAbstract
Nowadays biology teachers should be professional, ICT and information competent, and they must be able to create diverse teaching scenarios and apply modern technology, enabling students to acquire the knowledge and develop the competences needed for life in the 21st century. With the aim of determining the degree of implementation of information and communication technology in the educational process, a research was conducted on a sample of 65 biology teachers from the Split-Dalmatia County. The results show that biology teachers insufficiently apply ICT tools, and on the work they most commonly use Power Point presentations and their permutations. Length of teachers working experience and the types of schools in which they work are not factors frequently use of ICT tools in the educational process. The results can be the encouragement to transform the initial education of future biology teachers and guidelines for the necessary additional professional training of teachers practitioners and strengthening their ICT skills.References
BINGIMLAS, K. A. 2009. Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3): 235-245.
BULIĆ, M., NOVOSELIĆ, D. 2014. E-learning in Biology Classroom. ICT in Practice, UK. http://www.ictinpractice.com/e-learning-in-a-biology-classroom/(20. kolovoza 2016).
CARNet. 2012. Edu-modul 3: Razvoj digitalne kompetencije i multimedije u nastavi. http://www.carnet.hr/upload/javniweb/images/static3/91305/File/
Digitalna_kompetencija_prirucnik.pdf/(15. kolovoza 2016).
Europska Komisija/EACEA/Eurydice. 2012. Developing Key Competences at School in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy. Eurydice Report. Luksemburg: Ured za publikacije Europske unije.
European Commission: Education and Culture. 2005. Common European Principles for Teacher Competences and Qualifications. http://www.atee1.org/uploads/EUpolicies/common_eur_principles_en.pdf/(25. srpnja 2016)
European Trade Union Committee for Education (2008). Teacher Education in Europe: An ETUCE Policy Paper. http://etuce.homestead.com/Publications2008/ETUCE_PolicyPaper_en_web.pdf/(20. kolovoza 2016).
GAL, K. 2007. Uporaba PowerPoint prezentacija za postizanje bolje motivacije na satu engleskoga jezika s učenicima 2. razreda gimnazije. ŽIVOT I ŠKOLA: časopis za teoriju i praksu odgoja i obrazovanja, 53(17): 117-126.
JURČIĆ, M. 2012. Pedagoške kompetencije suvremenog učitelja. Zagreb: RECEDO doo.
JURIĆ, V. 2007. Kurikulum suvremene škole. U: Kurikulum: Teorije, metodologija, sadržaj, struktura, ur. V. Previšić, 253-303. Zagreb: Zavod za pedagogiju: Školska knjiga.
KOSTOVIĆVRANJEŠ, V. 2011. Information-communication technologies in biology teaching: present states and possibilities. U: Digital technologies and new forms of learning, ur. J. Milat, 181-189. Split: Faculty of philosophy University of Split, Faculty of education University of Chieti-Pescara.
KOSTOVIĆVRANJEŠ, V., BULIĆ, M. 2013. Izobraževanje za zdrav in trajnostni svet. U Okoljsko izobraževanje za 21. Stoletje, ur. M. Duh, 127-139.
Univerza v Mariboru Pedagoška fakulteta, RIS Dvorec Rakičan, Slovenia.
KOSTOVIĆVRANJEŠ, V., BULIĆ, M., NOVOSELIĆ, D. 2015. Kompetencije učitelja biologije za primjenu informacijsko-komunikacijskih tehnologija u nastavnom procesu. U: Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Splitu, ur. M.
Brčić Kuljiš, (6-7): 15-26. Split: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu.
KRUMSVIK, R. J. 2014. Teacher educators’ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3): 269-280.
LINDSTROMBERG, S. 2004. Language Activities for Teenagers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
LONČARIĆ, D. i PEJIĆ PAPAK, P. 2009. Profiliranje učiteljskih kompetencija. Odgojne znanosti, 11(2): 479 – 497.
LUKŠA, Ž., VUK S., PONGRAC, N, BENDELJA, D. 2014. Tehnologija u nastavi prirode i društva u osnovnoj školi. Educatio Biologiae EdBi, Br.1. (Dostupno na http://www.hbd-sbc.hr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/3-Luksa-i-sur.pdf/(15. srpnja 2016).
MLINAREVIĆ, V., BORIĆ, E. 2007. Stručni razvoj učitelja kao pretpostavka suvremene škole. U: Pedagogija - prema cjeloživotnom obrazovanju, ur. Previšić, V., Šoljan, N. N., Hrvatić, N., 421-431. Zagreb: Hrvatsko pedagogijsko društvo.
Nacionalni okvirni kurikulum za predškolski odgoj i obrazovanje te opće obvezno i srednjoškolsko obrazovanje 2010. Zagreb: Republika Hrvatska, Ministarstvo znanosti obrazovanja i sporta.
PERRENOUD, P. 2002. Key Competences. Brusseles: Eurydice, European Unit.
PITLER, H., HUBBELL, E. R., & KUHN, M. 2012. Using technology with classroom instruction that works. ASCD.
PREVIŠIĆ, V. 2003. Suvremeni učitelj: odgojitelj-medijator-socijalni integrator. U: Učitelj-učenik-škola. Zbornik radova Znanstveno-stručnog skupa povodom 140 godina učiteljskog učilišta u Petrinji, ur. B. Ličina. Petrinja: VUŠ Petrinja i HPKZ Zagreb.
RONČEVIĆ, A. 2008. Uvjerenja učitelja o multimedijima i ishodi učenja kod učenika.
http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/398761.UVJERENJA.pdf/(15. srpnja 2016).
SZABO, A., & HASTINGS, N. 2000. Using IT in the undergraduate classroom:
should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint?. Computers & education,
(3): 175-187.
