Evaluation of trade performance dynamics in Serbia using ARAT and Rough MABAC methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15291/oec.4559Keywords:
performance Serbian trade, ARAT, Rough MABACAbstract
Recently, there has been an increasing amount of literature dedicated to the importance and specifics of applying multi-criteria decision-making methods in trade. These methods, given that they are based on a mathematical approach, provide realistic results of the analysis of the treated problem. Based on that, this study investigates the dynamics of trade performance in Serbia based on the ARAT (Interval and Iterative Preference/Priority Scale), and the Rough MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) method. The results of the study show that in 2023, the best performance of trade in Serbia was achieved. The worst performance of trade in Serbia was achieved in 2018. The ranking of trade performance in Serbia is as follows: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The performance of trade in Serbia has continuously improved. Effective management of human resources, investments, capital, sales, and profit contributed to this. Certainly, the positive influence of other relevant factors (foreign direct investments, new business models - multichannel sales: store and electronic, private brand, sale of organic products, the concept of sustainable development - economic, social, and environmental dimensions, the idea of social responsibility) must not be neglected. , digitization of the entire business, etc.). To achieve the target profit in Serbian trade, adequate adaptation to dynamic complex changes in the business environment and macroeconomic trends (geopolitical situation, energy crisis, inflation, exchange rate, interest rates, etc.) is important. In all this, digitizing the entire trade business plays a significant role.
References
Aytekin, A. (2022). Energy, Environment, and Sustainability: A Multi-criteria Evaluation of Countries, Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 41(3), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4133
Aytekin, A. (2021). Chapter I Efficiency and performance analyses of food companies via IDOCRIW, REF-II, and OCRA methods, Business Studies and New Approaches, 7.
Aytekin, A. (2020). Çok kriterili karar problemine uzaklık ve referens temelli çözüt üçorı. (Doctor Thesis). Anadolu University. Eskişehir.
Božanić, D., Epler, I., Puška, A., Biswas, S., Marinković, D., & Koprivica, S. (2023). Application of the DIBR II–Rough MABAC decision-making model for ranking methods and techniques of lean organization systems management in the process of technical maintenance, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 22(1), 101-124.https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230614026B
Chattopadhyay, R., Das, P.P., and Chakraborty, S. (2022). Development of a Rough-MABAC-DoE-based metamodel for supplier selection in the iron and steel industry, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), 20-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta190222046c
Chakraborty, S., Dandge, S.S., & Agarwal, S. (2020). Non-traditional machining processes selection and evaluation: A rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106201
Ersoy, N. (2017). Performance measurement in the retail industry by using multi-criteria decision-
making methods, Ege Academic Review, 17(4), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2017431302
Lukic, R. (2021a). Application of MABAC Method in Evaluation of Sector Efficiency in Serbia. Review of International Comparative Management, 22(3), 400-417. DOI: 10.24818/RMCI.2021.3.400
Lukic, R. (2021b). Analysis Of Trade Efficiency In Serbia Based On The MABAC Method, Ekonomski pogledi - Economic Outlook, 23(2), 1-18.
Lukić, R. (2022). Evaluation of the efficiency of banks in Serbia using the MABAC method. Bankarstvo - Banking, 2, 35-60. DOI: 10.5937/bankarstvo2202010L
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.05
Pamučar,D., Stević, Ž., & Kazimieras Zavadskas, E.(2018). Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages. Applied Soft Computing, 67, 2018, 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.057
Puška, A., Štilić, A., Nedeljković, M, Božanić, D., &Biswas, S.(2023). Integrating Fuzzy Rough Sets with LMAW and MABAC for Green Supplier Selection in Agribusiness. Axioms, 12(8),746. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12080746